- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:18:37 +0900
- To: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Robert Burns (17 août 2007 - 15:57) : > Actually, for those tables, I was saying that able-bodied users > would have trouble consuming those tables. I find them almost > unusable. I do tend to magnify the text a bit for slight visual > impairment compensation, but even at their default size they're > very tedious to follow. On my laptops 1280x854 pixel display these > tables require that I pan 300% or or more horizontally and 10-fold > vertically to keep to visually associate the headers with the data > cells. I would probably be better off using an aural browser unless > fixed THEAD/TFOOT and scrolling bodies were implemented. So for me > I'd say: These are good comments but illustrate a design choice. I'm pretty sure we could improve the layout of the table. thead and tfoot are implementable with CSS. So it's really a question of choices in matter of design more than the technology itself. I guess I just gave me an action item to improve the layout of wbs. I'll have to check that with Dominique. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 17 August 2007 10:05:22 UTC