- From: Thomas Higginbotham <thomas@thomashigginbotham.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:19:59 -0400
- To: public-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <46CDC1BF.903@thomashigginbotham.com>
My point was to show that it can be relevant -- not to argue the morality of my friend. To placate your response, let's say that I read it on a forum somewhere instead of having my cruel friend describe it to me. :) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo wrote: > 2007/8/23, Thomas Higginbotham <thomas@thomashigginbotham.com>: > >> I believe it to be very relevant. For example, if my sighted friend >> tells me to click the image of the flag with stars and a large, red >> asterisk in the left corner, and the alt text simply says, "Australia", >> I might not have a clue what my friend is talking about. Alt text should >> accurately describe the image to non-sighted users unless the image has >> no purpose other than decoration. Using "Australia" as a tool-tip with >> the title attribute is perfectly fine since that is the purpose of the >> title attribute. >> >> > > If your sighted friend tells you that, knowing that you can't see the > image, then your friend is very cruel. > > Even if you don't have problems with your vision, why would anyone > tell you to click on a picture describing it that way instead of > "click on the australian flag" "yeah, you know, the third one" ? > > -- Thomas Higginbotham
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:22:51 UTC