- From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:54:45 +0100
- To: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- CC: Ben 'Cerbera' Millard <cerbera@projectcerbera.com>, HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>
Sorry, I seem to have removed a line from my message : the corrupted part was intended to read -- > You speak of "theoretical purity" as if it has negative connotations, > and there I do not agree : we have only to look at the expansion > of HTML to determine its intended r\^ole -- it is a HyperText /Markup/ > Language, rather than > You speak of "theoretical purity" as if it has negative connotations, > and there I do not agree : we r\^ole -- it is a HyperText /Markup/ > Language, as it was posted. Philip TAYLOR
Received on Friday, 31 August 2007 11:55:17 UTC