- From: Dmitry Turin <html60@narod.ru>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:29:21 +0400
- To: public-html@w3.org
Julian, maybe we prolong discussion !? >>> If document has this META >>> <head> >>> <meta name=register content=785> >>> </head> >>> let browser send to the following to server >>> <formdata> >>> <meta name=register content=785> >>> </formdata> >>> at once after loading document. JR>> Do you have a concrete proposal how to do that over HTTP? DT> We have __no requirement of compatibility__, DT> so why it should be necessarily DT> (1) 80-th port on browser side for 'messages of server by its initiative' ? DT> (2.1) exactly HTTP ? DT> (for example, i'd like to prefer XML instead of HTTP. DT> Besides my taste, this has consequences, going far: DT> if we accept XML for backward messages, DT> then there is hope, DT> that we shall be able to replace HTTP by XML for forward messages DT> - for messages, which we use now). DT> (2.2) current HTTP without extension ? DT> P.S. DT> Apparently browser's window should send indentified of itself DT> with <meta name=register content=785>. Dmitry Turin HTML6 (6.4.0) http://html60.chat.ru SQL4 (4.2.0) http://sql40.chat.ru Unicode2 (2.0.1) http://unicode2.chat.ru Computer2 (2.0.3) http://computer20.chat.ru
Received on Monday, 27 August 2007 04:29:33 UTC