- From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:24:06 +0100
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- CC: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>, public-html@w3.org
Simon Pieters wrote: > The distinction is that <ol> isn't necessarily appropriate just because > the items come in a particular order. They may for instance be sorted > alphabetically but the order doesn't actually matter. I think the spec > needs to be clearer on this point. > > http://www.autisticcuckoo.net/archive.php?id=2007/08/07/lists discusses > this issue. I would be very happy for Autistic Cuckoo's clarification to appear as a gloss : "A list is an ordered list if changing the order of the list items change[s] the meaning of the list as a whole." Philip TAYLOR
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2007 17:24:32 UTC