- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:54:31 -0400
- To: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Dean Edridge" <dean@55.co.nz>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 8/31/07, Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com> wrote: > I continue to believe that the specification should define a canonical > media type of "application/html" for the SGML inspired serialization of > HTML5 and then proceed to define appropriate content sniffing rules for > "text/html". I don't expect that would solve anything. Browser vendors sniff content largely because they think they need to (silently) fix publisher mistakes. What would be their motivation for stopping that practice for application/html? Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
Received on Friday, 31 August 2007 14:54:41 UTC