- From: Bill Mason <w3c@accessibleinter.net>
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 20:32:12 -0700
- To: public-html@w3.org
Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > Maciej at one point conceded with Ian in that «more widely implemented» was a «pretty strong» argument in favour of keeping HEADERS/ID.[1] > > The same is valid as an argument for keeping FOR/ID! They haven't been dropped. They just haven't been moved into the HTML5 draft yet from the WF2 document. http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-forms/current-work/#labels -- Bill Mason Accessible Internet w3c@accessibleinter.net http://accessibleinter.net/
Received on Saturday, 4 August 2007 03:32:27 UTC