Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID?

Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> Maciej at one point conceded with Ian in that «more widely implemented» was a «pretty strong» argument in favour of keeping HEADERS/ID.[1] 
> 
> 	The same is valid as an argument for keeping FOR/ID!

They haven't been dropped.  They just haven't been moved into the HTML5 
draft yet from the WF2 document.

http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-forms/current-work/#labels

-- 
Bill Mason
Accessible Internet
w3c@accessibleinter.net
http://accessibleinter.net/

Received on Saturday, 4 August 2007 03:32:27 UTC