- From: scott lewis <sfl@scotfl.ca>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:20:06 -0600
- To: aurélien levy <aurelien.levy@free.fr>
- Cc: HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
On 16 Aug 2007, at 0539, aurélien levy wrote: >> Given that the practical effect of requiring the alt attribute >> everywhere, including photo sites like Flickr, is typically one of >> those options, what benefits do options 2, 3 or 4 offer over >> option 1? > and what is the benefits of option 1 over 2,3 and 4 Fewer bytes on the wire, no redundant information in the file, and no pro forma uninformative attributes. Which results in smaller files with higher signal-to-noise ratios and _no loss of information_. scott.
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2007 12:20:27 UTC