Re: editing the wiki Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps)

On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 04:21:00PM +0900, Karl Dubost wrote:
>
> Jason and others,
>
> Le 15 ao?t 2007 ? 14:28, Jason White a ?crit :
>>>> I don't find 80% in any design principle.
>>>
>>> I have added Baby Steps. Note though that the design principles are not
>>> and never will be a complete description of how language design works.
>>
>> This is out of order as a matter of process: unilaterally deciding to add 
>> a
>> principle to the draft which hasn't been discussed here, and on which
>> consensus hasn't been reached, oversteps the legitimate role of an editor.
>> This thread shows that the proposed principle is indeed contentious, and
>> therefore it should not be added to the design principles until and unless 
>> it
>> has been clarified and agreed to by the working gorup.
>
> Editing the wiki and its content is not reserved to a small part of the 
> groups or after consensus.

That's fine with me, as long as it's the wiki and not the CVS repository,
which as I understand it is not open for editing by whoever in the working
group so wishes.

Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2007 10:11:46 UTC