- From: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
- Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 02:13:23 +0200
- To: <public-html@w3.org>
At 20:56 +0000 UTC, on 2007-08-03, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Mihai Sucan wrote: >> >> I have read the HTML 5 spec section on WYSIWYG editors [1] and I'd like >> to express my concern on requiring the inclusion of "(WYSIWYG editor)" >> in the META NAME="generator" CONTENT attribute value. > > I agree; in fact at this point I don't think anyone thinks it's a good > idea. We still need a better solution for handling the two tiers of > document quality Maybe it should be obvious, but it's not to me: why exactly is this needed? UAs already need to deal with pre-HTML5 documents, and for 'claiming to be HTML5' documents the spec defines how they must handle authoring errors. -- Sander Tekelenburg The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Saturday, 4 August 2007 00:21:53 UTC