- From: Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 23:33:37 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
2007/8/2, Sam Ruby: > Thomas Broyer wrote: > > Another (already proposed) alternative to your proposal would be to > > extend <script> to contain XML if its @type attribute is specified and > > with an XML Media Type value. UAs would then parse the <script> > > content as XML (yes, XML) and if all goes well (XML is wellformed) > > display it as if it has been an <object> with the given XML resource > > referenced with the @data attribute. If the XML is not wellformed, > > nothing would be displayed. > > I guess I missed this. URL to prior discussion (archives? wiki?) http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2006-December/008444.html This is my reply, talking about Microsoft's XML Script: http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2006-December/008688.html and Ian consequently changed parsing of CDATA to at least allow <script> to contain an "XML island" without throwing parse errors: http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/commit-watchers-whatwg.org/2007/000122.html -- Thomas Broyer
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2007 21:33:42 UTC