- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:20:27 +0200
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- CC: Philip Taylor <philip@zaynar.demon.co.uk>, public-html@w3.org
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > Please let's not go here again. HTML 5 *does* allow people to write > old-school HTML tag soup, and provides a way to know what will happen to > it in a good HTML5-capable browser. And I suspect it will continue to do > so, since there are number of strong advocates for it... Yes. > The issue of whether the spec should say "HTML good, XML bad" is > seperate from whether it should keep doing this - and while one opinion > was expressed that we go too far in doing so, I haven't seen any real > support for changing that. The issue in question is probably divisive Please count me as a supporter for rephrasing this. > enough. Let's try not to swallow the flamebait... Well, the easiest way to avoid that is not to put in claims like "XML bad" in the first place :-) Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 17:21:06 UTC