- From: Mihai Sucan <mihai.sucan@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:17:31 +0300
- To: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Le Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:15:51 +0300, Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk> a écrit: > Sorry, I rarely look at these detailed proposals, but > Mihai's might benefit by a little grammatical work : Hehe. I'm not a native English speaker. Thanks for correcting my suggestion. > Sadly I do not think that any conformance tool could reliably > identify such tables. It may therefore be necessary to tone > down the wording to match reality. I based my proposal on this issue statement: "Big Issue: we need some editorial text on how layout tables are bad practice and *non-conforming*" Non-conforming. I don't believe conformance criteria should only be machine-checkable. The spec should also contain conformance criteria that's only human-checkable, if needed. -- http://www.robodesign.ro
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2007 18:17:51 UTC