- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:05:52 +0900
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Le 1 août 2007 à 21:59, Jirka Kosek a écrit : > Henri Sivonen wrote: >> If someone wants to transfer XHTML5 infosets over SOAP, why >> should the spec insist on pure XML 1.0 support also being present? > > You have to draw line somewhere to ensure interoperability. See the section of the QA Framework about requirements and normative references. "When imposing requirements by normative references, address conformance dependencies." [1] See specifically the techniques and examples parts. Unicode has exactly the same constraints because it evolves. [2] "Implementations that support XML serialization of HTML5 must be compatible with the XML Infoset[3]…" [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#ref-define-practice [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-charmod-20050215/#sec-RefUnicode [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/ -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2007 08:06:30 UTC