- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:05:52 +0900
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Le 1 août 2007 à 21:59, Jirka Kosek a écrit :
> Henri Sivonen wrote:
>> If someone wants to transfer XHTML5 infosets over SOAP, why
>> should the spec insist on pure XML 1.0 support also being present?
>
> You have to draw line somewhere to ensure interoperability.
See the section of the QA Framework about requirements and normative
references.
"When imposing requirements by normative references,
address conformance dependencies." [1]
See specifically the techniques and examples parts. Unicode has
exactly the same constraints because it evolves. [2]
"Implementations that support XML serialization of HTML5 must be
compatible with the XML Infoset[3]…"
[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#ref-define-practice
[2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-charmod-20050215/#sec-RefUnicode
[3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2007 08:06:30 UTC