- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:32:00 +0900
- To: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Le 4 août 2007 à 05:56, Ian Hickson a écrit :
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Mihai Sucan wrote:
>> I have read the HTML 5 spec section on WYSIWYG editors [1] and I'd
>> like
>> to express my concern on requiring the inclusion of "(WYSIWYG
>> editor)"
>> in the META NAME="generator" CONTENT attribute value.
>
> I agree; in fact at this point I don't think anyone thinks it's a good
> idea. We still need a better solution for handling the two tiers of
> document quality,
It has nothing to do with wysiwyg editors, it is more about the
quality of the code as defined by a professional corpus. It is
interesting to see that here a form of versioning is coming back by
the backdoor.
I would suggest that once "HTML 5 for Authors" is done, the document
could carry.
<meta name="conform" content="html5-bp">
html5-bp = HTML 5 Best Practices. It would acknowledge a set of rules
defined by the Web community and considered as "good HTML".
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 6 August 2007 07:32:16 UTC