- From: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:02:13 +0100
- To: Ben Boyle <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Ben -- I'm 101% in favour of accessibility, but I cannot see how something similar to : <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="10;URL=http://somewhere.else/" can negatively impact the accessibility of a typical page on which it might be used. We use constructs such as this to (a) advise users that a page has moved (explicitly), and (b) take them to that page automatically after a finite delay if they don't follow the explicit link given in the prose of the page. Could you explain to me the negative effect this might have on someone dependent on uncompromised accessibility ? Philip Taylor
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2007 15:02:35 UTC