public-html@w3.org from August 2007 by author

Al Gilman

• Re: Screen-reader behaviour (Thursday, 30 August)

Alastair Campbell

• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Thursday, 30 August)
• RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Thursday, 30 August)
• RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Tuesday, 28 August)

Alexey Proskuryakov

• Re: Serialize U+00A0 as   in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) (Tuesday, 28 August)

Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo

• Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Form Serialization (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Monday, 6 August)

Andrew Fedoniouk

• Re: Semantics (was : Formal Recorded Complaint) (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: The canvas element (detailed review) (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: The canvas element (detailed review) (Saturday, 4 August)

Andrew Kirkpatrick

• RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Wednesday, 29 August)
• RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Wednesday, 29 August)
• RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Tuesday, 28 August)

Andrew Sidwell

• Re: Finding Real Use Cases for Longdesc (Thursday, 23 August)
• [HDP] Rename "Pave the Cowpaths" to something less analogy-prone (Wednesday, 22 August)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: 3.8. Sections (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: 3.8. Sections (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: 3.8.10. The address element (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of (Friday, 3 August)
• Ruby in HTML (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: 3.6. The root element (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Entities (part of detailed review) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Formal Recorded Complaint (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: 3.6. The root element (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)

Arthur Jennings

• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Thursday, 30 August)

aurélien levy

• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)

Ben 'Cerbera' Millard

• Re: Screen-reader behaviour (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: M| Motion to use prefix to categorize messages and threads (Robert's Rules of Order over Email) (Sunday, 19 August)
• Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Starting On Topic (Rant) (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Improving the Header Relationship Algorithm (Discussion) (Monday, 13 August)
• Stephen Ferg's Table Research (Monday, 13 August)
• Multipage version of spec (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: complex tables: heading cells and summary cells (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: Table Collection - W3C HTML Working Group Top 200 Survey (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Data Table Collections (Research) (Monday, 6 August)
• Data Table Collections (Research) (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Formal Recorded Complaint (Wednesday, 1 August)

Ben Boyle

• Re: Alt Text for A Key Part of the Content (Tuesday, 28 August)
• conformance (was Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element) (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: table, cell, heading, leader, trailer, header, footer, runner, TABLE, THEAD, TFOOT, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data (Friday, 17 August)
• 4.5. Interfaces for URI manipulation (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: 3.8.10. The address element (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: 3.8. Sections (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: 3.8. Sections (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: 3.8.10. The address element (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: 3.8.10. The address element (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: 3.8.10. The address element (Tuesday, 7 August)
• meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• 3.8. Sections (Tuesday, 7 August)
• 3.8.10. The address element (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: 3.14.11. The canvas element (Monday, 6 August)
• 3.8.8. The header element (Sunday, 5 August)
• 3.14.11. The canvas element (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element (Sunday, 5 August)
• 3.8.5. The blockquote element (Thursday, 2 August)
• 3.8.1. The body element (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Maturity Re: (of XML) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: 3.6. The root element (Wednesday, 1 August)

Bill Mason

• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Saturday, 4 August)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: Serialize U+00A0 as &nbsp; in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Sunday, 26 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element (Wednesday, 22 August)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: how to get my login info? (Sunday, 26 August)
• Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: The canvas element (detailed review) (Sunday, 5 August)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: Re[3]: <pages> <page>...<page> </pages> (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: Re[5]: <table presentation="pie"> (was: Re: <table chart="pie">) (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: <meta name=register>, Browser as passive tool (Monday, 27 August)
• Supporting real accessibility Re: Seeing the open issues (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: link warmth (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: getting feedback from other w3c "accessibility" lists (was: A better ALT) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Maturity Re: (of XML) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Accessibility and design principles in action Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element (Wednesday, 1 August)

Chris Blouch

• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Tuesday, 21 August)

Chris Wilson

• Microsoft review of HTML5 draft delayed (Friday, 31 August)
• agenda 30 Aug HTML WG teleconference (Wednesday, 29 August)
• RE: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• RE: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Monday, 20 August)
• RE: Ruby in HTML (Wednesday, 15 August)

Craig Francis

• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Monday, 6 August)
• The <label> (Saturday, 4 August)

Dan Connolly

• product classes, "support some version of XML" (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Thursday, 30 August)
• let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Thursday, 30 August)
• keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Thursday, 30 August)
• strike "This specification should be read like all other specifications." (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Thursday, 30 August)
• auction sites and XHTML 2 (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Thursday, 30 August)
• "presentation concerns" out of scope? (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Thursday, 30 August)
• spell out HTML in title and/or abstract (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Thursday, 30 August)
• "vague subject referred to as Web Applications" (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Thursday, 30 August)
• change "scientific documents" to "basic hypertext" (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Thursday, 30 August)
• teleconference bridge for 30 Aug HTML WG teleconference (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: This Working Group needs a Secretary (Friday, 24 August)
• RE: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: conformance (was Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element) (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: User Testing elements of HTML 5 spec (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (new thread?) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: no mention of BOMs in sniffing algorithm (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (new thread?) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Tuesday, 21 August)
• content type configuration prototype, usability testing? [was: review ... by IETF/HTTP community] (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• process proposals should start off-list [was: ... categorize messages and threads] (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG (Friday, 17 August)
• please review "XHTML Role Attribute Module" working draft (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: HTML Design Principles Review (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Support for Design Principles (was: Design Principles survey delayed) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: unconference agenda for HTML WG meeting 8-9 Nov? (Wednesday, 15 August)
• agenda HTML WG 16 Aug: design principles, spec reviews, table headers, XML serialization name, forms TF, ... (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Forms Taskforce participation (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Design Principles survey delayed (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Research needs tracking (Wednesday, 15 August)
• agenda HTML WG teleconference 16 Aug (in progress) (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: Likert scale for survey? (on design principles) (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Likert scale for survey? (on design principles) (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Friday, 3 August)
• care with subject lines, please [was: Formal Recorded Complaint] (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Minutes, HTML WG 2007-08-02 phone conference (Thursday, 2 August)
• agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2 Aug (Wednesday, 1 August)
• scribe for tomorrow's teleconference, please? (Wednesday, 1 August)

Dave Singer

• Re: SMIL 3 WD and HTML 5 Editor's draft (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: Reality Check: Bi-polar Accessibility Disorder (BAD) (Wednesday, 1 August)

David Håsäther

• Re: Typos and suggestions for small corrections in WF2 Section 2 (Part of the detailed review of WF2) (Friday, 31 August)

David Poehlman

• Re: Screen-reader behaviour (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Wednesday, 22 August)

Dean Edridge

• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5 (Friday, 31 August)
• The only name for the xml serialisation of html5 (Thursday, 30 August)

Debi Orton

• RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Monday, 6 August)

DESCHAMPS Stephane ROSI/SI CLIENT

• RE: Screen-reader behaviour (Friday, 31 August)

Dmitry Turin

• Re[2]: <meta name=register>, Browser as passive tool (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re[7]: <table presentation="pie"> (was: Re: <table chart="pie">) (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re[5]: <pages> <page>...<page> </pages> (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re[2]: Decision cube (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re[5]: <table presentation="pie"> (was: Re: <table chart="pie">) (Monday, 27 August)
• Re[6]: <table presentation="pie"> (was: Re: <table chart="pie">) (Monday, 27 August)
• Re[3]: <pages> <page>...<page> </pages> (Monday, 27 August)
• Re[3]: <meta name=register>, Browser as passive tool (Monday, 27 August)

Doug Schepers

• Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element (Wednesday, 1 August)

Dylan Smith

• Re: (Un)Ordered lists (Thursday, 23 August)

Edward O'Connor

• Re: Form Serialization (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Tuesday, 7 August)

Elliotte Harold

• Re: [whatwg] Offline Web Apps (Tuesday, 28 August)

Evans, Donald

• RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)

Garrett Smith

• how to get my login info? (Sunday, 26 August)
• Re: Form Serialization (Saturday, 25 August)
• [ FIELDSET ] - disabled and readonly (Thursday, 16 August)
• Form Serialization (Thursday, 16 August)

Geoffrey Sneddon

• Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Rewriting |m| (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Visible greater-than sign (part of detailed review of edits) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Difference of content model of |ins| and |del| (part of detailed spec review of Edits) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• (Un)Ordered lists (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples (Monday, 20 August)
• Editorial issues (part of detailed review of "Determining the type of a new resource in a browsing context") (Friday, 17 August)
• Step 10 of Feed/HTML sniffing (part of detailed review of "Determining the type of a new resource in a browsing context") (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: link warmth (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Support for Design Principles (was: Design Principles survey delayed) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Entities (part of detailed review) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: 3.4. Global attributes (Wednesday, 1 August)

Gez Lemon

• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Wednesday, 29 August)

Gloria Reece

• RE: non-conforming authoring tools: the backplane of portals, networking & photo sites (Friday, 24 August)

gonchuki

• Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element (Wednesday, 22 August)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

• Re: agenda 30 Aug HTML WG teleconference (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Screen-reader behaviour (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Multilanguage alt/title (Wednesday, 29 August)
• [HDP] Why Accessibility Is An Important & Essential Principle (Friday, 24 August)
• [HDP] principle "Universal Access" (Thursday, 23 August)
• "real life" longdesc examples (Thursday, 23 August)
• non-conforming authoring tools: the backplane of portals, networking & photo sites (Thursday, 23 August)
• is OBJECT broken? if so by whom & what can be done? (Monday, 20 August)
• getting feedback from other w3c "accessibility" lists (was: A better ALT) (Saturday, 18 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Keeping some order in the wiki (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Keeping some order in the wiki (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration (Monday, 13 August)
• HTML5 Draft Request: use an ISO 639-2 specified language (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: integration of WF2 into HTML5 draft -- when, if, and how? (Monday, 6 August)
• arguments for retention of LEGEND and FIELDSET (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: integration of WF2 into HTML5 draft -- when, if, and how? (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: The <label> (Sunday, 5 August)
• integration of WF2 into HTML5 draft -- when, if, and how? (Saturday, 4 August)
• Steps Towards a Common WG Vocabulary (Thursday, 2 August)
• UAAG Test Suite: User Agent Support for HTML 4.01 (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Alternate Additional Attribute Set for a Single Quote Element (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Patterns for explicit associations (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Patterns for explicit associations (Wednesday, 1 August)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Distinguishing different aspects of accessibility (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Distinguishing different aspects of accessibility (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Distinguishing different aspects of accessibility (was Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content) (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Character encoding errors (detailed review of parsing algorithm) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Conformance checkers (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content (was: Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests?) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: XML versions (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: XML versions (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Entities (part of detailed review) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Maturity of XML (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: XML versions (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: XHTML2 and namespaces (part of detailed review) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Character encoding errors (detailed review of parsing algorithm) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)

Ian Hickson

• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Friday, 24 August)
• Offline Web Apps (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Whitespace after </body> (detailed review of parsing algorithm) (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Whitespace after </body> (detailed review of parsing algorithm) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Difference of content model of |ins| and |del| (part of detailed spec review of Edits) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Seeing the open issues (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Seeing the open issues (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Seeing the open issues (Monday, 20 August)
• Seeing the open issues (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: agenda HTML WG 16 Aug: design principles, spec reviews, table headers, XML serialization name, forms TF, ... (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps) (Wednesday, 15 August)
• The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps) (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Text presentation of image maps (detailed review of Semantics) (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: 3.8.10. The address element (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: non-leading <param>s in <object> fallback (detailed review of Semantics) (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: Review: 3.4.6. The irrelevant attribute (Friday, 10 August)
• Re: Data Table Collections (Research) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: integration of WF2 into HTML5 draft -- when, if, and how? (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: 3.15 Tabular Data Review (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Comments on IRC log (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Character encoding errors (detailed review of parsing algorithm) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Comments on IRC log (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: 3.15 Tabular Data Review (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Character encoding errors (detailed review of parsing algorithm) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Reflecting attributes: HTMLElement (detailed review of the DOM) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: <li value=bogus> (detailed review of Semantics) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) (Wednesday, 1 August)

Ian J. Wessman

• Re: Form Serialization (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Friday, 17 August)

j.j.

• Re: 3.8.10. The address element (Monday, 13 August)

James Graham

• Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Review of table processing model (section 3.15.11. Processing model) (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Formal Recorded Complaint (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element (Wednesday, 1 August)

Jan Richards

• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)

Jason White

• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] (Sunday, 19 August)
• Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG (Saturday, 18 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: editing the wiki Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps) (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps) (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Assertions regarding the quality of HTML documents (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Marking up alternative versions of content (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Marking up alternative versions of content (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: integration of WF2 into HTML5 draft -- when, if, and how? (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: transparent content model and proposed ALT element (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: transparent content model (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Marking up alternative versions of content (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Rephrasing Universal Access Design Principle (was Re: Formal Recorded Complaint) (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Marking up alternative versions of content (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Formal Recorded Complaint (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: @lang => @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Thursday, 2 August)
• traffic shaping on the list (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Formal Recorded Complaint (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: 3.6. The root element (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Formal Recorded Complaint (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) (Wednesday, 1 August)

Jim Jewett

• Determining Script Type (Tuesday, 7 August)
• rewording algorithms (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)

Jirka Kosek

• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: XML versions (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: XML versions (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: XML versions (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Entities (part of detailed review) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Conformance checkers (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Maturity of XML (Wednesday, 1 August)
• XML versions (Wednesday, 1 August)
• XHTML2 and namespaces (part of detailed review) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Namespaces (part of detailed review) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Entities (part of detailed review) (Wednesday, 1 August)

John Foliot

• RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Friday, 31 August)
• RE: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Thursday, 30 August)
• RE: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) (Friday, 24 August)
• RE: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) (Thursday, 23 August)
• RE: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) (Thursday, 23 August)
• Answering the question... (Thursday, 23 August)

John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program

• RE: An open letter to Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 23 August)

Jon Barnett

• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Wednesday, 29 August)
• <figure> and <img> (was Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG) (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: Form Serialization (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] (Thursday, 16 August)
• Fwd: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Saturday, 4 August)

Jon Gunderson

• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Monday, 20 August)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: Downloading of images by UA (Friday, 31 August)

Josef Spillner

• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration (Monday, 13 August)

Joshue O Connor

• Re: Screen-reader behaviour (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: [HDP] Secure by design (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: [HDP] Secure by design (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Saturday, 18 August)
• Re: A better longdesc (Saturday, 18 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Saturday, 18 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: [Spam] Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: HTML Design Principles Review (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: Evidence of usefulness of specific accessibility solutions (was Rewording the Design Principles) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel] (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: Formal Recorded Complaint (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Comments on IRC log (Thursday, 2 August)

João Eiras

• Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 21 August)

Julian Reschke

• Re: Serialize U+00A0 as &nbsp; in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: Serialize U+00A0 as &nbsp; in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: <meta name=register>, Browser as passive tool (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Sunday, 26 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Sunday, 26 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Saturday, 25 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Saturday, 25 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Saturday, 25 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Maturity Re: (of XML) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Maturity of XML (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Maturity of XML (Wednesday, 1 August)

Karl Dubost

• Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5 (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: An open letter to Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: [HDP] Missing principles (Friday, 24 August)
• Fwd: Review of Distributed Extensibility in HTML5 (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Sunday, 19 August)
• Re: abbreviation exposition and pronunciation (Sunday, 19 August)
• Re: table, cell, heading, leader, trailer, header, footer, runner, TABLE, THEAD, TFOOT, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: table, cell, heading, leader, trailer, header, footer, runner, TABLE, THEAD, TFOOT, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration (Thursday, 16 August)
• practical use/techniques of alt attribute for images (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: editing the wiki Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps) (Wednesday, 15 August)
• editing the wiki Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps) (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Ruby in HTML (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: HTML5 Draft Request: use an ISO 639-2 specified language (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: HTML5 Draft Request: use an ISO 639-2 specified language (Monday, 13 August)
• [admin] W3C Wiki migration (Monday, 13 August)
• SMIL 3 WD and HTML 5 Editor's draft (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Data Table Collections (Research) (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Maturity of XML (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: XML versions (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Maturity of XML (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Conformance checkers (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)

Kornel Lesinski

• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Thursday, 30 August)

L. David Baron

• Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Tuesday, 21 August)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: Examples for recommending alt omission needed for testing (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI (Monday, 27 August)
• Alt Text for A Key Part of the Content (Sunday, 26 August)
• Marking Up Accessible Comic Strips (Sunday, 26 August)
• Re: non-conforming authoring tools: the backplane of portals, networking & photo sites (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: [HDP] Secure by design (Thursday, 23 August)
• Finding Real Use Cases for Longdesc (Thursday, 23 August)
• Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire (Wednesday, 22 August)
• [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes (Monday, 20 August)
• Placeholder Text for Text Boxes (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: M| Motion to use prefix to categorize messages and threads (Robert's Rules of Order over Email) (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Saturday, 18 August)
• Re: Support for Design Principles (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (was: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel) (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: highlighting of "major known issues" in the working draft (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: highlighting of "major known issues" in the working draft (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: table, column group, column, row groups, TABLE, CAPTION, COLGROUP, COL, THEAD, TFOOT, TR, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: complex tables: heading cells and summary cells (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: 3.8. Sections (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: The <label> (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: integration of WF2 into HTML5 draft -- when, if, and how? (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Maturity of XML (Thursday, 2 August)

Laura Carlson

• Design Principles Premise (Sunday, 19 August)
• Re: Likert scale for survey? (on design principles) (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Likert scale for survey? (on design principles) (Monday, 6 August)
• Likert scale for survey? (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: 3.15 Tabular Data Review (Thursday, 2 August)

Lee Kowalkowski

• Detailed review of Section 2. The Document Object Model. (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: (code, sample output and keyboard/device input <code>, <samp>, <kybd>) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: Minutes, HTML WG 2007-08-02 phone conference (Thursday, 2 August)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Friday, 31 August)
• RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: QA vs. Baby Steps, Cowpaths, RealProblems (Friday, 17 August)
• QA vs. Baby Steps, Cowpaths, RealProblems (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: [HDP] error in "Support World Languages" (Friday, 17 August)
• [HDP] error in "Support World Languages" (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: <p><table> parsing (detailed review of parsing algorithm) (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Formal Recorded Complaint (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Saturday, 4 August)
• HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Saturday, 4 August)

liorean

• Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Semantics (was : Formal Recorded Complaint) (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: DIV as an inline container (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: DIV as an inline container (Saturday, 4 August)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Equivalents (was Re: Multilanguage alt/title) (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Multilanguage alt/title (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Multilanguage alt/title (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Multilanguage alt/title (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: This Working Group needs a Secretary (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Offline Web Apps (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: [HDP] error in "Support World Languages" (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: HTML Design Principles Review (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: 4.5. Interfaces for URI manipulation (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Design Principles survey delayed (Thursday, 16 August)
• HTML Design Principles Review (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• a web site that is incompatible with HTML5 namespace requirements for HTML serialization (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: arguments for retention of LEGEND and FIELDSET (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Thursday, 2 August)

Magnus Kristiansen

• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Saturday, 25 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Saturday, 25 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Saturday, 25 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Saturday, 25 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Saturday, 25 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire (Wednesday, 22 August)

Marcin Hanclik

• [HDP] 3.3. Media Independence (Friday, 17 August)

Marghanita da Cruz

• Re: "presentation concerns" out of scope? (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Is there a WIKI of test cases? Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Equivalents (was Re: Multilanguage alt/title) (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: Alt Text for A Key Part of the Content (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: Offline Web Apps (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: [HDP] Missing principles (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• HTML5 - Video and audio codecs for video elements (Tuesday, 21 August)

Mark Baker

• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)

Martin Espericueta

• Re: Semantics (was : Formal Recorded Complaint) (Monday, 6 August)

Matthew Raymond

• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: abbreviation exposition and pronunciation (Sunday, 19 August)
• Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Opening thoughts on WAI-ARIA in HTML5 (Thursday, 2 August)

Maurice Carey

• Re: Alt Text for A Key Part of the Content (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: 3.8.10. The address element (Wednesday, 8 August)

McClure, David M

• RE: Forms Taskforce participation (Tuesday, 21 August)

Michael A Squillace

• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Wednesday, 29 August)

Michael A. Puls II

• Re: Removing the data attribute on <object> (detailed review of Semantics) (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: An open letter to Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Whitespace after </body> (detailed review of parsing algorithm) (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Serializing PIs in HTML (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) (Wednesday, 15 August)
• <object>: should the name attribute be allowed for form submission with plug-ins? (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: non-leading <param>s in <object> fallback (detailed review of Semantics) (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: CR and LF in the input stream / as NCRs (detailed review of parsing algorithm) (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: CR and LF in the input stream / as NCRs (detailed review of parsing algorithm) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: 3.6. The root element (Wednesday, 1 August)

Michael Horn

• link warmth (Wednesday, 15 August)

Michael(tm) Smith

• Minutes, HTML WG 2007-08-02 phone conference (Thursday, 2 August)

Mihai Sucan

• Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Review of 3.15.1. The table element (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Review of 3.14.11. The canvas element (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Review of 3.14.11. The canvas element (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Monday, 6 August)
• Detailed review of 3.14.9. Media elements (Sunday, 5 August)
• Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of (Friday, 3 August)
• Correction for 3.2.4.2. Vaguer moments in time (Friday, 3 August)
• Review: 3.4.6. The irrelevant attribute (Friday, 3 August)
• 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Friday, 3 August)

mikko.honkala@nokia.com

• WF2 2.13. Adding type attribute for the output element (Part of detailed review of WF2) (Friday, 31 August)
• Typos and suggestions for small corrections in WF2 Section 2 (Part of the detailed review of WF2) (Friday, 31 August)

moz@jeka.info

• Re: 3.5.2. Focus (Wednesday, 1 August)

Olivier GENDRIN

• Re: Patterns for explicit associations (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: change "scientific documents" to "basic hypertext" (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Thursday, 30 August)
• Multilanguage alt/title (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: Marking Up Accessible Comic Strips (Sunday, 26 August)
• Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI (Sunday, 26 August)
• Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: (code, sample output and keyboard/device input <code>, <samp>, <kybd>) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Thursday, 16 August)

Patrick Garies

• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Saturday, 25 August)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: "real life" longdesc examples (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Wednesday, 15 August)

Peter Karlsson

• Re: Character encoding errors (detailed review of parsing algorithm) (Wednesday, 1 August)

Peter Krantz

• Re: A better ALT (Saturday, 18 August)

Philip Taylor

• Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML (was: Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Image Equivalent Content Wiki page (Saturday, 25 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Review of 3.14.11. The canvas element (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Seeing the open issues (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Review of 3.14.11. The canvas element (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Hierarchical link types (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] (Saturday, 18 August)
• Re: Stripping leading line feeds (Saturday, 18 August)
• Stripping leading line feeds (Saturday, 18 August)
• Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: HTML5 Draft Request: use an ISO 639-2 specified language (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: 3.14.11. The canvas element (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: The canvas element (detailed review) (Saturday, 4 August)
• The canvas element (detailed review) (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Maturity of XML (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Maturity of XML (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Maturity of XML (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Maturity of XML (Wednesday, 1 August)

Philip Taylor (Webmaster)

• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Typos and suggestions for small corrections in WF2 Section 2 (Part of the detailed review of WF2) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Screen-reader behaviour (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Screen-reader behaviour (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Screen-reader behaviour (Thursday, 30 August)
• Screen-reader behaviour (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: Alt Text for A Key Part of the Content (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI (Friday, 24 August)
• An open letter to Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: [HDP] Missing principles (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: (Un)Ordered lists (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Seeing the open issues (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Rewriting |m| (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: (Un)Ordered lists (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: link warmth (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration (Monday, 13 August)
• Semantics (was : Formal Recorded Complaint) (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Reality Check: Bi-polar Accessibility Disorder (BAD) (Wednesday, 1 August)

Richard Conyard

• RE: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• RE: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes (Monday, 20 August)

Richard Ishida

• RE: Ruby in HTML (Wednesday, 29 August)
• RE: [HDP] Other comments from RI (Friday, 24 August)
• RE: [HDP] Missing principles (Friday, 24 August)
• [HDP] Other comments from RI (Thursday, 23 August)
• [HDP] Missing principles (Thursday, 23 August)
• RE: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• RE: @lang => @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Thursday, 2 August)
• RE: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Thursday, 2 August)

Rimantas Liubertas

• Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration (Monday, 13 August)

Rob Burns

• Re: M| Motion to use prefix to categorize messages and threads (Robert's Rules of Order over Email) (Monday, 20 August)
• M| Motion to use prefix to categorize messages and threads (Robert's Rules of Order over Email) (Sunday, 19 August)
• problem-statements for HTML 4.01 differences (Tuesday, 14 August)

Robert Burns

• Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML (was: Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• making better ad hoc use of class attribute values (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• keeping out semantic facilities for theoretical purity (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Multilanguage alt/title (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Multilanguage alt/title (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Multilanguage alt/title (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Multilanguage alt/title (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: Multilanguage alt/title (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Sunday, 26 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Sunday, 26 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Sunday, 26 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Sunday, 26 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Sunday, 26 August)
• Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) (Friday, 24 August)
• Image Equivalent Content Wiki page (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Offline Web Apps (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: [HDP] Secure by design (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Finding Real Use Cases for Longdesc (Thursday, 23 August)
• [HDP] Secure by design (Thursday, 23 August)
• [HDP] Pave the Cowpaths (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: [HDP] Support World Languages (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: [HDP] Solving real problems (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: [Offtopic] Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: abbreviation exposition and pronunciation (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Sunday, 19 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Sunday, 19 August)
• numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax (Sunday, 19 August)
• Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] (Sunday, 19 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Sunday, 19 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Saturday, 18 August)
• Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG (Saturday, 18 August)
• [HDP] 3.3. Media Independence (Saturday, 18 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Saturday, 18 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Saturday, 18 August)
• Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Saturday, 18 August)
• Re: Ian's Approach to Editing (Was: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state) (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: table, cell, heading, leader, trailer, header, footer, runner, TABLE, THEAD, TFOOT, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG (Thursday, 16 August)
• using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Research needs tracking (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: table, cell, heading, leader, trailer, header, footer, runner, TABLE, THEAD, TFOOT, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Keeping some order in the wiki (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Keeping some order in the wiki (was Re: problem-statements for HTML 4.01 differences) (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Improving the Header Relationship Algorithm (Discussion) (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Research needs tracking (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Research needs tracking (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research (Tuesday, 14 August)
• WYSIWYG, GUI, visual and non-semantic editors: final part of my review of 9 WYSIWYG editors (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration (Tuesday, 14 August)
• WYSIWYG, GUI, visual and non-semantic editors: part of my review of 9 WYSIWYG editors (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: Improving the Header Relationship Algorithm (Discussion) (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration (Monday, 13 August)
• COLGROUP and COL, TR and TBODY: part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data (Friday, 10 August)
• table, DOM interfaces, cell, heading, leader, trailer, header, footer, runner, TABLE, CAPTION, COLGROUP, COL, THEAD, TFOOT, TR, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data (Friday, 10 August)
• table, presentational attributes, 2-D 2d 2 dimensional cells, data, header,heading, attribute inheritance, TABLE, CAPTION, COLGROUP, COL, THEAD, TFOOT, TR, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data (Friday, 10 August)
• table, cell, heading, row, header, TD, TH,TR: part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data (Thursday, 9 August)
• table, column group, column, row groups, TABLE, CAPTION, COLGROUP, COL, THEAD, TFOOT, TR, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: complex tables: heading cells and summary cells (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: 3.8. Sections (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: complex tables: heading cells and summary cells (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Wednesday, 8 August)
• complex tables: heading cells and summary cells (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: 3.8.10. The address element (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: 3.8. Sections (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: Semantics (was : Formal Recorded Complaint) (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Semantics (was : Formal Recorded Complaint) (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Distinguishing different aspects of accessibility (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Marking up alternative versions of content (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: transparent content model and proposed ALT element (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: DIV as an inline container (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: DIV as an inline container (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: transparent content model (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Marking up alternative versions of content (Saturday, 4 August)
• transparent content model (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Marking up alternative versions of content (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Marking up alternative versions of content (Saturday, 4 August)
• DIV as an inline container (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Saturday, 4 August)
• Issues surrounding Tables: backwards compatibility and complex tables (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of (Friday, 3 August)
• completion of review of "Prose" section (currently 3.9) (Friday, 3 August)
• The br element: part of review of "Prose" section (currently 3.9) (Friday, 3 August)
• The p element: part of review of "Prose" section (currently 3.9) (Friday, 3 August)
• Real solutions, semantics, and proposals of members of this WG (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Thursday, 2 August)
• @lang => @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Thursday, 2 August)
• detailed spec reviews wiki page (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Alternate Additional Attribute Set for a Single Quote Element (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Alternate Additional Attribute Set for a Single Quote Element (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: 3.6. The root element (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: 3.6. The root element (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: 3.6. The root element (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: 3.6. The root element (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Formal Recorded Complaint (Wednesday, 1 August)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Saturday, 25 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Saturday, 25 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)

ryan

• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: no mention of BOMs in sniffing algorithm (Tuesday, 21 August)
• no mention of BOMs in sniffing algorithm (Tuesday, 21 August)
• editorial comment about "4.7.4. Content-Type sniffing: feed or HTML" (Saturday, 18 August)

Sam Ruby

• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) (Friday, 31 August)
• This Working Group needs a Secretary (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (new thread?) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Thursday, 2 August)
• Distributed Extensibility (Thursday, 2 August)

Sander Tekelenburg

• Re: Typos and suggestions for small corrections in WF2 Section 2 (Part of the detailed review of WF2) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Screen-reader behaviour (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Screen-reader behaviour (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Screen-reader behaviour (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Thursday, 30 August)
• RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Equivalents (was Re: Multilanguage alt/title) (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Equivalents (was Re: Multilanguage alt/title) (Thursday, 30 August)
• Equivalents (was Re: Multilanguage alt/title) (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Multilanguage alt/title (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: Image Equivalent Content Wiki page (Saturday, 25 August)
• Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: [HDP] Support World Languages (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: getting feedback from other w3c "accessibility" lists (was: A better ALT) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Forms Taskforce participation (Tuesday, 21 August)
• IE's object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• A better ALT (Saturday, 18 August)
• A better ALT (Saturday, 18 August)
• Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Keeping some order in the wiki (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Keeping some order in the wiki (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Evidence of usefulness of specific accessibility solutions (was Rewording the Design Principles) (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Keeping some order in the wiki (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Keeping some order in the wiki (was Re: problem-statements for HTML 4.01 differences) (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: 3.8. Sections (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Multipage version of spec (was Re: 3.8.10. The address element) (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: 3.8. Sections (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: 3.8. Sections (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: 3.8. Sections (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: 3.8. Sections (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: Assertions regarding the quality of HTML documents (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Distinguishing different aspects of accessibility (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Marking up alternative versions of content (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Marking up alternative versions of content (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Marking up alternative versions of content (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: Marking up alternative versions of content (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: Marking up alternative versions of content (Sunday, 5 August)
• Re: Marking up alternative versions of content (Saturday, 4 August)
• W3C terminology (was Re: Rephrasing Universal Access Design Principle) (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Saturday, 4 August)
• Rephrasing Universal Access Design Principle (was Re: Formal Recorded Complaint) (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Distinguishing different aspects of accessibility (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Formal Recorded Complaint (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Steps Towards a Common WG Vocabulary (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content (Thursday, 2 August)
• Distinguishing different aspects of accessibility (was Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Indexing agreement on accessibility (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content (was: Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests?) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content (was: Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests?) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content (Wednesday, 1 August)

scott lewis

• Re: Answering the question... (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)

Sean Fraser

• Re: Table Collection - W3C HTML Working Group Top 200 Survey (Tuesday, 7 August)

Shawn Medero

• Re: This Working Group needs a Secretary (Friday, 24 August)

Sierk Bornemann

• Re: Determining Script Type (Tuesday, 7 August)

Simon Pieters

• Re: Serialize U+00A0 as &nbsp; in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) (Monday, 27 August)
• Serialize U+00A0 as &nbsp; in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: Marking Up Accessible Comic Strips (Monday, 27 August)
• <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) (Thursday, 23 August)
• Removing the data attribute on <object> (detailed review of Semantics) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Whitespace after </body> (detailed review of parsing algorithm) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: (Un)Ordered lists (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: document.title (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Editorial: "child node" (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Serializing PIs in HTML (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Text presentation of image maps with <object> (detailed review of Semantics) (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Text presentation of image maps (detailed review of Semantics) (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: 3.8.10. The address element (Tuesday, 7 August)
• non-leading <param>s in <object> fallback (detailed review of Semantics) (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of (Saturday, 4 August)

Smylers

• Re: Ian's Approach to Editing (Was: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state) (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: Maxmizing Useful alt Text (Was: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Omitting alt Where It's Unknown (Was: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: 3.8.10. The address element (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: Rewording Algorithms and Script Types (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: 3.8.10. The address element (Tuesday, 7 August)

Steve Faulkner

• Examples for recommending alt omission needed for testing (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Seeing the open issues (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Seeing the open issues (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Seeing the open issues (Tuesday, 21 August)

Steven Faulkner

• Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 (Wednesday, 29 August)
• review of HTML Design Principles - questionnaire (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: Support for Design Principles (was: Design Principles survey delayed) (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: highlighting of "major known issues" in the working draft (Tuesday, 14 August)
• highlighting of "major known issues" in the working draft (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? (Wednesday, 8 August)

T.V Raman

• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Friday, 31 August)
• Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Formal Recorded Complaint (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) (Wednesday, 1 August)

Thomas Broyer

• Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Case-insensitive comparison (part of my detailed review of tokenization) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Permitted slash not defined in terms of void elements (part of my detailed review of the tokenization section) (Monday, 20 August)
• [Offtopic] Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Distributed Extensibility (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Entities (part of detailed review) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Entities (part of detailed review) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Entities (part of detailed review) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Namespaces in HTML (Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Entities (part of detailed review) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: HTML 5 proposal - OBJECT elements, environment discovery and alternative content (Wednesday, 1 August)

Thomas Higginbotham

• Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context (Thursday, 23 August)

Tighe K. Lory

• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features (Thursday, 30 August)

Tom Morris

• Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel (Tuesday, 14 August)

Weston Ruter

• Web Forms 2.0 and a Cross-Browser Implementation (Wednesday, 22 August)

William Loughborough

• Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? (Thursday, 16 August)

Репейный Вадим

• correction of auto-table and auto-tree (Monday, 27 August)
• auto-table & presentation=decart (Monday, 27 August)
• <table><tside>: displaying of table 3x100 of DBMS as table 10x10 (Monday, 27 August)
• Decision cube (Monday, 27 August)

Last message date: Friday, 31 August 2007 23:46:20 UTC