- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:32:49 +0200
- To: "Ben Boyle" <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:04:04 +0200, Ben Boyle <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com> wrote: > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#address > > 1. I think there is some poor wording here: "Typically, the address > element would be included with other information in a footer element." > The footer element explicitly states it cannot include sections, i.e. > footer cannot contain address. Maybe it should be allowed to? Search > for "<address>" and you will find an example that has <footer> and > <address> as siblings rather than nested. <address> is not a sectioning element. > 2. Would anyone else like the content model of address broadened? I > would like to be able to structure contact details using lists and > tables (when appropriate) and to do this within address tags. The > "paragraph" model is restrictive and I don't understand the reasons > for the restriction. <address> can already contain lists and tables. (Lists and tables can be structured inline-level elements, which is a subset of inline-level content.) > [...] -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2007 14:33:03 UTC