- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:35:43 +0200
- To: "Sander Tekelenburg" <st@isoc.nl>, public-html@w3.org
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:23:05 +0200, Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl> wrote:
> So I'masking if, given that, it is really necessary to speak of
> "nearest ancestor sectioning element", or that "parent sectioning
> element" would cover the same. ("Parent" is likely to be understood by
> more people
> than "nearest ancestor".)
That sounds confusing to me because it doesn't actually define the
constraints you seem to be working with such that non-sectioning elements
are to be ignored in usage of "parent".
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 13:36:11 UTC