ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2014 by author

Adam Rice

• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt (Thursday, 21 August)

Adrian Cole

• Re: Getting it out the door. Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Sunday, 28 September)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: YAC Proposal (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)

Adrien de Croy

• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: proxies are dangerous slide (Monday, 21 July)

Albert Lunde

• RE: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Friday, 11 July)

Alexey Melnikov

• Fwd: [apps-discuss] Call For Adoption: draft-nottingham-http-problem (Sunday, 3 August)

Alvaro Lopez Ortega

• Re: HPACK opcode bit patterns (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: #557: Intra-message HEADERS frames (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)

Amos Jeffries

• Re: Headers vs Response Code for 2NN Contents Of Related (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Getting it out the door. Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: #601: HTTP2-Settings header field name (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: #603: Frame layout (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: Fwd: [http-auth] WGLC for draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-04 (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: Why Range doesn't work for LDP "paging" (cf 2NN Contents-of-Related) (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: 303 for paging; was Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: updated http 1.1 rfcs and hop-by-hop (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: updated http 1.1 rfcs and hop-by-hop (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Sunday, 17 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Header Parsing Profile (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: ext#9: OppSec and Proxies (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00 (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed Standard (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Pseudo end-to-end connections considered harmful (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: #557: Intra-message HEADERS frames (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Sending priority from a server (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: A rough analysis of the impact of headers on DoS (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: A rough analysis of the impact of headers on DoS (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: #540: "jumbo" frames (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: #540: "jumbo" frames (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Wednesday, 9 July)
• RE: YAC Proposal (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• RE: #529: Working around concurrency limits (Thursday, 3 July)
• RE: YAC Proposal (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: YAC Proposal (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #529: Working around concurrency limits (Wednesday, 2 July)

Andrei Popov

• RE: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 25 September)
• RE: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• RE: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Saturday, 20 September)
• RE: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Saturday, 20 September)
• RE: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: CRLF requirement (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: CRLF requirement (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: CRLF requirement (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4031) (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4031) (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4031) (Tuesday, 1 July)

Barry Leiba

• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc7238bis-01.txt (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed Standard (Sunday, 10 August)
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4050) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4031) (Tuesday, 1 July)

Ben Burkert

• Re: TLS over http2 frames (Friday, 15 August)
• TLS over http2 frames (Friday, 15 August)

bizzbyster@gmail.com

• Re: Initial agenda for Toronto (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: why not multiple, short-lived HTTP/2 connections? (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: why not multiple, short-lived HTTP/2 connections? (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: why not multiple, short-lived HTTP/2 connections? (Tuesday, 1 July)

Brian Smith

• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: RFC7238bis (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: Ciphersuites (was Re: Mandatory to implement cipher suites) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Ciphersuites (was Re: Mandatory to implement cipher suites) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Ciphersuites (was Re: Mandatory to implement cipher suites) (Saturday, 19 July)

Buzonas, Steve

• Re: Expiration impending: <draft-nottingham-http-patch-status-00.txt> (Friday, 12 September)

Carsten Bormann

• Re: CRLF requirement (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: CRLF requirement (Tuesday, 1 July)

Chris Drechsler

• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)

Cory Benfield

• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: Ending streams/connections (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Reporting interop issues (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: #555: frame synchronization (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: WINDOW_UPDATE(0) ? (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (and not arguing about CONTINUATION frames) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)

cowwoc

• Ambiguity parsing WWW-Authenticate value (Wednesday, 9 July)

Cullen Jennings (fluffy)

• proxies are dangerous slide (Monday, 21 July)

Cyrus Daboo

• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)

Daniel Sommermann

• Re: PUSH_PROMISE and load balancers (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: Size of window variables (Thursday, 3 July)

Daniel Stenberg

• Re: #603: Frame layout (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: #603: Frame layout (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Wednesday, 2 July)

David Krauss

• Re: HPACK opcode bit patterns (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Constrained Devices (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Constrained Devices (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: #539: Priority from server to client (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: #549: END_STREAM flag on CONTINUATION (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #539: Priority from server to client (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #539: Priority from server to client (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Sending priority from a server (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Sending priority from a server (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Sending priority from a server (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Sending priority from a server (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Sending priority from a server (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: H2 HEADERS and flow control (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: H2 HEADERS and flow control (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: H2 HEADERS and flow control (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: CRLF requirement (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: CRLF requirement (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Tuesday, 1 July)

Eliot Lear

• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Sunday, 17 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: Service Bindings DNS Records (draft-nygren-service-bindings-00) (Wednesday, 9 July)

emile.stephan@orange.com

• RE: ext#9: OppSec and Proxies (Tuesday, 29 July)
• RE: Preliminary minutes from Toronto (Tuesday, 29 July)
• draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption (Tuesday, 22 July)

Eric J. Bowman

• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-14 and draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-09 (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 DoS Vulnerability (Was: HTTP/2 response completed before its request) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 DoS Vulnerability (Was: HTTP/2 response completed before its request) (Wednesday, 2 July)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: See Other vs Contents of Related, was: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Tuesday, 2 September)
• 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Tuesday, 26 August)

Eric Rescorla

• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Ciphersuites (was Re: Mandatory to implement cipher suites) (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)

Erik Nygren

• Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16) (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Alt-Svc-Used indicator granularity (ext#34) (Sunday, 24 August)
• Alt-Svc-Used indicator granularity (ext#34) (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16) (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16) (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16) (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16) (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: #557 Intra-Message HEADERS frames was: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Service Bindings DNS Records (draft-nygren-service-bindings-00) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Service Bindings DNS Records (draft-nygren-service-bindings-00) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Service Bindings DNS Records (draft-nygren-service-bindings-00) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Service Bindings DNS Records (draft-nygren-service-bindings-00) (Tuesday, 8 July)

Glen Knowles

• Re: PUSH_PROMISE and load balancers (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: #549: END_STREAM flag on CONTINUATION (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: #551: Limiting header sizes (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: CRLF requirement (Wednesday, 2 July)

Greg Wilkins

• Re: null ciphers in 9.2.2 (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Websockets (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Sunday, 28 September)
• Getting it out the door. Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Sunday, 28 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Sunday, 28 September)
• Re: #603: Frame layout (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: null ciphers in 9.2.2 (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Friday, 5 September)
• 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: Ending streams/connections (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Ending streams/connections (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: h2 padding (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Saturday, 30 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 Push deployed on webtide.com (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: [http2-spec] Hpack optimization (#587) (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: HTTP2 Stream timeouts? (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: Static Table Entries (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Static Table Entries (Friday, 8 August)
• HTTP2 Stream timeouts? (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: HPACK opcode bit patterns (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: stream state management was: 1xx (informational) responses affect on stream management (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: 1xx (informational) responses affect on stream management (Tuesday, 5 August)
• 100 Continue editorial comment (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Sunday, 3 August)
• Process? Was: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Sunday, 3 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-14 and draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-09 (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: #549: END_STREAM flag on CONTINUATION (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: #557: Intra-message HEADERS frames (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Options for CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Options for CONTINUATION-related issues (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Options for CONTINUATION-related issues (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: #551: Limiting header sizes (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Wiki for CONTINUATION Proposals (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: reserved flags and extensions (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: willchan's thoughts on continuations, jumbo frames, etc after *only skimming* the threads (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Friday, 11 July)
• Bad Actors, was: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: #540: "jumbo" frames (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: #540: "jumbo" frames (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal - WINDOW UPDATE (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal - WINDOW UPDATE (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal - WINDOW UPDATE (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: H2 HEADERS and flow control (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: H2 HEADERS and flow control (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: H2 HEADERS and flow control (Friday, 4 July)
• H2 HEADERS and flow control (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: YAC Proposal (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Blackmail??? Was: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Blackmail??? Was: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)

Guille -bisho-

• Re: h2 padding (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Tuesday, 2 September)

henry.story@bblfish.net

• advanced uses of TLS-renegotiation & draft-thomson specs (Thursday, 3 July)

Hutton, Andrew

• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00 (Wednesday, 6 August)
• RE: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00.txt (Monday, 28 July)
• RE: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00.txt (Tuesday, 1 July)

Ilari Liusvaara

• Re: HTTP/2 and Websockets (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Websockets (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Websockets (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Feedback on Fallback (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Saturday, 20 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: HPACK, Draft 09, Integer Representation (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Sunday, 17 August)
• Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Constrained Devices (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-14 and draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-09 (Sunday, 3 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Sunday, 3 August)
• Re: Why "MUST" encoder emit Context Update (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)

internet-drafts@ietf.org

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-03.txt (Tuesday, 30 September)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc7238bis-01.txt (Tuesday, 16 September)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc7238bis-00.txt (Thursday, 21 August)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt (Monday, 18 August)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-09.txt (Thursday, 31 July)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-14.txt (Wednesday, 30 July)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-02.txt (Friday, 4 July)

James Adjamli

• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)

James M Snell

• Re: Fwd: Expiration impending: <draft-nottingham-http-patch-status-00.txt> (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-link-method-10.txt (Saturday, 2 August)
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-link-method-10.txt (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: #557: Intra-message HEADERS frames (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: #557: Intra-message HEADERS frames (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: http/2 and "extensions" (Tuesday, 15 July)
• http/2 and "extensions" (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Treating paths and queries differently, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-http-jfv-00.txt (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)

Jason Greene

• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: #603: Frame layout (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: HPACK opcode bit patterns (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Constrained Devices (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Options for CONTINUATION-related issues (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Options for CONTINUATION-related issues (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Options for CONTINUATION-related issues (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: #540: "jumbo" frames (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: #540: "jumbo" frames (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: YAC Proposal (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: YAC Proposal (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: YAC Proposal (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: YAC Proposal (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Another CONTINUATION Proposal (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: CONTINUATION proposal w/ minimum change (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: CONTINUATION proposal w/ minimum change (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: CONTINUATION proposal w/ minimum change (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: CONTINUATION proposal w/ minimum change (Tuesday, 1 July)

Jeff Pinner

• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Getting it out the door. Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Wednesday, 24 September)
• RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Sunday, 3 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Sunday, 3 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: REFUSED_STREAM => RETRY_STREAM (editorial) was: RE: hpack table size 0 (Friday, 1 August)
• Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: #549: END_STREAM flag on CONTINUATION (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: #540: "jumbo" frames (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Another CONTINUATION Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Another CONTINUATION Proposal (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Another CONTINUATION Proposal (Tuesday, 1 July)

Jeroen de Borst

• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)

Jesse Wilson

• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)

Jim Manico

• Re: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Monday, 22 September)

Johnny Graettinger

• legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: #539: Priority from server to client (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: #539: Priority from server to client (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: #539: Priority from server to client (Tuesday, 1 July)

Jonathan Thackray

• Frame size errors and GOAWAY prose still ambiguous (Monday, 29 September)

Julian Reschke

• Re: User-Agent header field and quoted-string (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: User-Agent header field and quoted-string (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-03.txt (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: Headers vs Response Code for 2NN Contents Of Related (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Headers vs Response Code for 2NN Contents Of Related (Sunday, 28 September)
• Re: Headers vs Response Code for 2NN Contents Of Related (Sunday, 28 September)
• Re: Headers vs Response Code for 2NN Contents Of Related (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• registration requirement for range units, was: Why Range doesn't work for LDP "paging" (cf 2NN Contents-of-Related) (Saturday, 20 September)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc7238bis-01.txt (Tuesday, 16 September)
• Re: Fwd: Expiration impending: <draft-nottingham-http-patch-status-00.txt> (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: Fwd: Expiration impending: <draft-nottingham-http-patch-status-00.txt> (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: 303 for paging; was Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: 303 for paging; was Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Editorial notes on http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-02 (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: See Other vs Contents of Related, was: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Friday, 5 September)
• See Other vs Contents of Related, was: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Rejecting messages with illegal characters in header fields (was Re: h2 header field names) (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• JSON encoding, was: Quick feedback on draft-nottingham-web-proxy-desc-00 (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Quick feedback on draft-nottingham-web-proxy-desc-00 (Wednesday, 3 September)
• LC process, was: h2 priority (Tuesday, 2 September)
• HPACK WGLC feedback: appendices (Sunday, 31 August)
• HPACK->HTTP/2 dependency (Sunday, 31 August)
• HPACK WGLC feedback (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: RFC7238bis (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16) (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-02, 5. The Alt-Svc-Used HTTP Header Field (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Treating paths and queries differently, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-http-jfv-00.txt (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Initial agenda for Toronto (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Ambiguity parsing WWW-Authenticate value (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• HTTP/3, was: HTTP/2 DoS Vulnerability (Was: HTTP/2 response completed before its request) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: agenda/charter brainstorming (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Wednesday, 2 July)
• trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: CRLF requirement (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: CRLF requirement (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4031) (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4031) (Tuesday, 1 July)

K.Morgan@iaea.org

• RE: #603: Frame layout (Monday, 29 September)
• RE: h2 padding (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• RE: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: Static Table Entries (Thursday, 7 August)
• RE: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 6 August)
• stream state management was: 1xx (informational) responses affect on stream management (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: REFUSED_STREAM => RETRY_STREAM (editorial) was: RE: hpack table size 0 (Friday, 1 August)
• s/RST_STREAM/TERMINATE_STREAM (editorial) was: Naming Consistency (editorial) (Friday, 1 August)
• RE: Naming Consistency (editorial) (Friday, 1 August)
• RE: REFUSED_STREAM => RETRY_STREAM (editorial) was: RE: hpack table size 0 (Friday, 1 August)
• RE: Why "MUST" encoder emit Context Update (Thursday, 31 July)
• RE: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Possible to support only HTTP/2 for "http" URIs? "https" URIs? (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: #539: Priority from server to client (Wednesday, 16 July)
• REFUSED_STREAM => RETRY_STREAM (editorial) was: RE: hpack table size 0 (Wednesday, 16 July)
• RE: "Upgrade: h2c" (Wednesday, 16 July)
• RE: "Upgrade: h2c" (Wednesday, 16 July)
• "Upgrade: h2c" (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Possible to support only HTTP/2 for "http" URIs? "https" URIs? (Wednesday, 16 July)
• RE: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• RE: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• RE: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• RE: #557 Intra-Message HEADERS frames was: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Monday, 14 July)
• RE: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Monday, 14 July)
• RE: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• RE: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Monday, 14 July)
• #557 Intra-Message HEADERS frames was: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• PRIORITY extension (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• RE: willchan's thoughts on continuations, jumbo frames, etc after *only skimming* the threads (Friday, 11 July)
• RE: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• RE: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• RE: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Thursday, 10 July)
• RE: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• RE: Compressing HTTP headers (Thursday, 10 July)
• RE: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• RE: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• RE: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• RE: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Wednesday, 9 July)
• RE: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Another CONTINUATION Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• RE: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• RE: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Monday, 7 July)
• RE: #541: CONTINUATION - option #4 (Monday, 7 July)
• RE: YAC Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• RE: CONTINUATION proposal w/ minimum change (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Saturday, 5 July)
• RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 6.2 HEADERS, 6.10 CONTINUATION, END_SEGMENT (0x2) (Thursday, 3 July)
• RE: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• YAC Proposal (Wednesday, 2 July)
• RE: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• RE: #541: CONTINUATION (Wednesday, 2 July)
• RE: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• RE: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• RE: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• RE: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• RE: CONTINUATION proposal w/ minimum change (Tuesday, 1 July)

Kaoru Maeda

• HPACK: pseudo-headers ordering (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)

Kari Hurtta

• draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 6.8 GOAWAY (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 6.2 HEADERS, 6.10 CONTINUATION, END_SEGMENT (0x2) (Friday, 4 July)
• draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1 HTTP Request/Response Exchange (Sunday, 6 July)
• draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 6.2 HEADERS again (Sunday, 6 July)

Kinkie

• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: #555: frame synchronization (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: #555: frame synchronization (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: ext#7 / ext#8: multiple alt-svc (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: ext#7 / ext#8: multiple alt-svc (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: ext#7 / ext#8: multiple alt-svc (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: ext#7 / ext#8: multiple alt-svc (Thursday, 3 July)

Kulkarni, Saurabh

• Re: Static Table Entries (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: Static Table Entries (Thursday, 7 August)

Lucas Pardue

• RE: h2 Connection Preface (Wednesday, 10 September)
• RE: h2 Connection Preface (Tuesday, 9 September)
• RE: h2 Connection Preface (Tuesday, 9 September)
• RE: Clarification on HTTP/1.1 Server Response to HTTP/2 Client Connection Preface (Friday, 29 August)
• RE: Clarification on HTTP/1.1 Server Response to HTTP/2 Client Connection Preface (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Clarification on HTTP/1.1 Server Response to HTTP/2 Client Connection Preface (Thursday, 28 August)
• Clarification on HTTP/1.1 Server Response to HTTP/2 Client Connection Preface (Wednesday, 27 August)

Makaraju, Maridi Raju (Raju)

• RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt (Thursday, 21 August)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: #591: Permissible states for extension frames (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: #601: HTTP2-Settings header field name (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Saturday, 27 September)
• #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Friday, 26 September)
• #591: Permissible states for extension frames (Friday, 26 September)
• #601: HTTP2-Settings header field name (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: Zero padding (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Discussion of 9.2.2 (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: Zero padding (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Monday, 22 September)
• Fwd: [http-auth] WGLC for draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-04 (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Expiration impending: <draft-nottingham-http-patch-status-00.txt> (Monday, 15 September)
• Fwd: Expiration impending: <draft-nottingham-http-patch-status-00.txt> (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: See Other vs Contents of Related, was: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: HPACK WGLC feedback (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 definition of HTTP2-Settings (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: HPACK, Draft 09, Integer Representation (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: RFC7238bis (Thursday, 28 August)
• Working Group Last Call: RFC7238bis (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16) (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-14 and draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-09 (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Ciphersuite requirements ext#26 (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Alt-Svc: alternatives assigned by alternatives (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Alt-Svc: alternatives assigned by alternatives (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16) (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 Push deployed on webtide.com (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: ext#9: OppSec and Proxies (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: TLS over http2 frames (Friday, 15 August)
• HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: Feedback on Fallback (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: [http2-spec] Hpack optimization (#587) (Thursday, 14 August)
• Hawaii meeting (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Friday, 8 August)
• Fwd: Second Last Call: <draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14.txt> (Protocol to Access White-Space (PAWS) Databases) to Proposed Standard (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00 (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00 (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed Standard (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-link-method-10.txt (Saturday, 2 August)
• Repository for HTTP/1.1 Issues (Friday, 1 August)
• Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-14 and draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-09 (Friday, 1 August)
• Header Parsing Profile (Tuesday, 29 July)
• ext#9: OppSec and Proxies (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Call for Adoption: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00 (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Preliminary minutes from Toronto (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed Standard (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: TLS 1.2 MTI (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: #549: END_STREAM flag on CONTINUATION (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 24 July)
• Fwd: [apps-discuss] Last Call conduct redux (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: #557: Intra-message HEADERS frames (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: #557: Intra-message HEADERS frames (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Issues #555 and #556 (:query and frame sync) (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: #539: Priority from server to client (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: #555: frame synchronization (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Monday, 21 July)
• #555: frame synchronization (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Sunday, 20 July)
• #549: END_STREAM flag on CONTINUATION (Sunday, 20 July)
• #557: Intra-message HEADERS frames (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Friday, 18 July)
• Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Options for CONTINUATION-related issues (Thursday, 17 July)
• Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Options for CONTINUATION-related issues (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Options for CONTINUATION-related issues (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: "Upgrade: h2c" (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Options for CONTINUATION-related issues (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• #551: Limiting header sizes (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #529: Working around concurrency limits (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #539: Priority from server to client (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Initial agenda for Toronto (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Editor-ready: Frame size (to address #553) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Wiki for CONTINUATION Proposals (Saturday, 12 July)
• Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: willchan's thoughts on continuations, jumbo frames, etc after *only skimming* the threads (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION - option #4 (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION - option #4 (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Sunday, 6 July)
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: ext#7 / ext#8: multiple alt-svc (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #529: Working around concurrency limits (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: ext#7 / ext#8: multiple alt-svc (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• #541: CONTINUATION (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: agenda/charter brainstorming (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Wednesday, 2 July)
• ext#9: OppSec and Proxies (Wednesday, 2 July)
• ext#7 / ext#8: multiple alt-svc (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Wednesday, 2 July)
• #529: Working around concurrency limits (Wednesday, 2 July)
• #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: CRLF requirement (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: hpack table size 0 (Tuesday, 1 July)
• #539: Priority from server to client (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: CONTINUATION proposal w/ minimum change (Tuesday, 1 July)
• #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4031) (Tuesday, 1 July)

Martijn Faassen

• Re: updated http 1.1 rfcs and hop-by-hop (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: updated http 1.1 rfcs and hop-by-hop (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: updated http 1.1 rfcs and hop-by-hop (Monday, 18 August)
• updated http 1.1 rfcs and hop-by-hop (Monday, 11 August)

Martin J. Dürst

• Re: Why Range doesn't work for LDP "paging" (cf 2NN Contents-of-Related) (Tuesday, 16 September)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Saturday, 5 July)

Martin Nilsson

• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Sunday, 28 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: Fwd: Expiration impending: <draft-nottingham-http-patch-status-00.txt> (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Huffman [was: Re: h2 header field names] (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: HTTP/2 Push deployed on webtide.com (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: Static Table Entries (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: CRLF requirement (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: CRLF requirement (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: CRLF requirement (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Tuesday, 1 July)

Martin Thomson

• Re: null ciphers in 9.2.2 (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: null ciphers in 9.2.2 (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: User-Agent header field and quoted-string (Tuesday, 30 September)
• User-Agent header field and quoted-string (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: null ciphers in 9.2.2 (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: SETTINGS frame - not documented as peer-to-peer only (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: Frame size errors and GOAWAY prose still ambiguous (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: upgrade prose bug (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Saturday, 27 September)
• editorial changes committed (Friday, 26 September)
• null ciphers in 9.2.2 (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: PUSH_PROMISE and load balancers (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: PUSH_PROMISE and load balancers (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: Frame size errors (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Zero padding (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Frame size errors (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: Expiration impending: <draft-nottingham-http-patch-status-00.txt> (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Fwd: Expiration impending: <draft-nottingham-http-patch-status-00.txt> (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: Fwd: Expiration impending: <draft-nottingham-http-patch-status-00.txt> (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: h2 Connection Preface (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: h2 Connection Preface (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: h2 Connection Preface (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Huffman [was: Re: h2 header field names] (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Huffman [was: Re: h2 header field names] (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Huffman [was: Re: h2 header field names] (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: http2-14 (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Rejecting messages with illegal characters in header fields (was Re: h2 header field names) (Thursday, 4 September)
• Rejecting messages with illegal characters in header fields (was Re: h2 header field names) (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 definition of HTTP2-Settings (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Clarification on HTTP/1.1 Server Response to HTTP/2 Client Connection Preface (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Clarification on HTTP/1.1 Server Response to HTTP/2 Client Connection Preface (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Alt-Svc-Used indicator granularity (ext#34) (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16) (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: handling bad priority parameters (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Ciphersuite requirements ext#26 (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16) (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Ciphersuite requirements ext#26 (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Alt-Svc: alternatives assigned by alternatives (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16) (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16) (Monday, 18 August)
• Alt-Svc alternative cache invalidation (ext#16) (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: Miscellaneous Comments on -14 (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Permissible states for extension frames #591 (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: Static Table Entries (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Static Table Entries (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Static Table Entries (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Static Table Entries (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: Static Table Entries (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: Static Table Entries (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: HTTP2 Stream timeouts? (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: HPACK opcode bit patterns (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00 (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: HPACK: pseudo-headers ordering (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00 (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: 1xx (informational) responses affect on stream management (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: 1xx (informational) responses affect on stream management (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Section 6.9 (WINDOW_UPDATE), shouldn't it always be a connection error if window increment is 0? (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: 100 Continue editorial comment (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Constrained Devices (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Constrained Devices (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Constrained Devices (Monday, 4 August)
• Editorial comments (was: WGLC) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Sunday, 3 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-14, 10.5.1. Limits on Header Block Size (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-14, 8.1.3. Examples (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-14, 8.1.3. Examples (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-09, 3.3.2. Header Table (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: REFUSED_STREAM => RETRY_STREAM (editorial) was: RE: hpack table size 0 (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Why "MUST" encoder emit Context Update (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-14. 5.1. Stream States (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00 (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: ext#9: OppSec and Proxies (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 24 July)
• Consequences of removing the reference set (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Pseudo end-to-end connections considered harmful (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Wednesday, 23 July)
• TLS 1.2 MTI (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: #557: Intra-message HEADERS frames (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: #557: Intra-message HEADERS frames (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: #555: frame synchronization (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.5 Malformed Requests and Responses, response of HEAD request (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Ciphersuites (was Re: Mandatory to implement cipher suites) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Ciphersuites (was Re: Mandatory to implement cipher suites) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Ciphersuites (was Re: Mandatory to implement cipher suites) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Options for CONTINUATION-related issues (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: #551: Limiting header sizes (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Mandatory to implement cipher suites (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Possible to support only HTTP/2 for "http" URIs? "https" URIs? (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: #539: Priority from server to client (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: #551: Limiting header sizes (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Possible to support only HTTP/2 for "http" URIs? "https" URIs? (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: http/2 and "extensions" (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #539: Priority from server to client (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #539: Priority from server to client (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: http/2 and "extensions" (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: http/2 and "extensions" (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: http/2 and "extensions" (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #539: Priority from server to client (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: #557 Intra-Message HEADERS frames was: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: reserved flags and extensions (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Sending priority from a server (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: A rough analysis of the impact of headers on DoS (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Sending priority from a server (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Sending priority from a server (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: willchan's thoughts on continuations, jumbo frames, etc after *only skimming* the threads (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: "Can we please append a byte to the HEADERS frame" (Thursday, 10 July)
• "Can we please append a byte to the HEADERS frame" (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 4.3 Header Compression and Decompression, 10.6 Use of Compression (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 4.3 Header Compression and Decompression, 10.6 Use of Compression (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal - WINDOW UPDATE (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1 HTTP Request/Response Exchange (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Compressing HTTP headers (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1 HTTP Request/Response Exchange (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 6.2 HEADERS again (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 6.8 GOAWAY (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 6.2 HEADERS, 6.10 CONTINUATION, END_SEGMENT (0x2) (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 6.2 HEADERS, 6.10 CONTINUATION, END_SEGMENT (0x2) (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: WINDOW_UPDATE(0) ? (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: ext#7 / ext#8: multiple alt-svc (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: H2 HEADERS and flow control (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: ext#7 / ext#8: multiple alt-svc (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: END_SEGMENT? (#397) (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00.txt (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Tuesday, 1 July)

Matthew Cox

• RE: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Friday, 26 September)
• RE: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Thursday, 25 September)
• 1xx (informational) responses affect on stream management (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Section 6.9 (WINDOW_UPDATE), shouldn't it always be a connection error if window increment is 0? (Tuesday, 5 August)

Matthew Kerwin

• Re: SETTINGS frame - not documented as peer-to-peer only (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: SETTINGS frame - not documented as peer-to-peer only (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: Headers vs Response Code for 2NN Contents Of Related (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Headers vs Response Code for 2NN Contents Of Related (Sunday, 28 September)
• Re: #603: Frame layout (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: #591: Permissible states for extension frames (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: #601: HTTP2-Settings header field name (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: Frame size errors (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 303 for paging; was Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Rejecting messages with illegal characters in header fields (was Re: h2 header field names) (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: RFC7238bis (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: handling bad priority parameters (Saturday, 23 August)
• handling bad priority parameters (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: #549: END_STREAM flag on CONTINUATION (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: http/2 and "extensions" (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: http/2 and "extensions" (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: reserved flags and extensions (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: ext#7 / ext#8: multiple alt-svc (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: ext#7 / ext#8: multiple alt-svc (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: CONTINUATION proposal w/ minimum change (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Tuesday, 1 July)

Micaela Gallerini

• Re: Why Range doesn't work for LDP "paging" (cf 2NN Contents-of-Related) (Tuesday, 16 September)

Michael Sweet

• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: HTTP2 Stream timeouts? (Sunday, 10 August)
• Re: HPACK opcode bit patterns (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: HPACK opcode bit patterns (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: HPACK opcode bit patterns (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: #555: frame synchronization (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: "Upgrade: h2c" (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Friday, 4 July)
• Questions about SETTINGS and SETTINGS ACK (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: YAC Proposal (Thursday, 3 July)
• HEADERS/CONTINUATION data point for CUPS and HTTP/2 (in case anyone is interested) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Typos in draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-08 examples... (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)

Michaela LaVan

• Re: #603: Frame layout (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Wednesday, 24 September)

Mike Belshe

• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: willchan's thoughts on continuations, jumbo frames, etc after *only skimming* the threads (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 DoS Vulnerability (Was: HTTP/2 response completed before its request) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Blackmail??? Was: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)

Mike Bishop

• RE: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Wednesday, 24 September)
• RE: Frame size errors (Tuesday, 23 September)
• RE: Feedback on Fallback (Monday, 22 September)
• RE: Feedback on Fallback (Monday, 22 September)
• RE: Clarification on HTTP/1.1 Server Response to HTTP/2 Client Connection Preface (Thursday, 28 August)
• RE: Clarification on HTTP/1.1 Server Response to HTTP/2 Client Connection Preface (Thursday, 28 August)
• RE: Push and Caching (Friday, 22 August)
• RE: Push and Caching (Friday, 22 August)
• RE: Push and Caching (Thursday, 21 August)
• RE: Permissible states for extension frames #591 (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Push and Caching (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Feedback on Fallback (Thursday, 14 August)
• RE: [http2-spec] Hpack optimization (#587) (Wednesday, 13 August)
• RE: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Thursday, 7 August)
• RE: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Thursday, 7 August)
• RE: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 6 August)
• RE: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-14 and draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-09 (Monday, 4 August)
• RE: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Monday, 4 August)
• RE: REFUSED_STREAM => RETRY_STREAM (editorial) was: RE: hpack table size 0 (Friday, 1 August)
• RE: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) (Thursday, 24 July)
• RE: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Friday, 4 July)
• RE: Questions about SETTINGS and SETTINGS ACK (Thursday, 3 July)
• RE: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (and not arguing about CONTINUATION frames) (Thursday, 3 July)
• RE: YAC Proposal (Thursday, 3 July)
• RE: #529: Working around concurrency limits (Thursday, 3 July)
• RE: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• RE: YAC Proposal (Thursday, 3 July)
• RE: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• RE: #541: CONTINUATION (Wednesday, 2 July)
• RE: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• RE: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• RE: hpack table size 0 (Tuesday, 1 July)
• RE: #539: Priority from server to client (Tuesday, 1 July)

Moto Ishizawa

• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Saturday, 12 July)

Nicholas Hurley

• Re: #603: Frame layout (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Mandatory to implement cipher suites (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Options for CONTINUATION-related issues (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: #540: "jumbo" frames (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: #540: "jumbo" frames (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: #540: "jumbo" frames (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: H2 HEADERS and flow control (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: YAC Proposal (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Wednesday, 2 July)

Nicolas Mailhot

• Re:Quick feedback on draft-nottingham-web-proxy-desc-00 (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)

Nottingham, Mark

• #603: Frame layout (Friday, 26 September)

Osama Mazahir

• RE: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Friday, 26 September)
• RE: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response (Wednesday, 24 September)
• RE: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Thursday, 7 August)
• RE: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Thursday, 7 August)
• HPACK opcode bit patterns (Wednesday, 6 August)
• RE: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Why "MUST" encoder emit Context Update (Wednesday, 30 July)
• RE: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Saturday, 12 July)

Patrick McManus

• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 18 September)
• Editorial notes on http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-02 (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Reporting interop issues (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Push and Caching (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Alt-Svc: alternatives assigned by alternatives (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Hawaii meeting (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: #555: frame synchronization (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: willchan's thoughts on continuations, jumbo frames, etc after *only skimming* the threads (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: ext#9: OppSec and Proxies (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)

Paul Hoffman

• Re: Reporting interop issues (Thursday, 4 September)

Pavel Rappo

• Re: HPACK WGLC feedback (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: HPACK, Draft 09, Integer Representation (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: HPACK, Draft 09, Integer Representation (Thursday, 28 August)
• HPACK, Draft 09, Integer Representation (Thursday, 28 August)

Peter Ghosh

• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)

Peter Gutmann

• Re: CRLF requirement (Saturday, 5 July)

Peter L

• Re: Initial agenda for Toronto (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: #529: Working around concurrency limits (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: #529: Working around concurrency limits (Wednesday, 9 July)

Phil Hunt

• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Friday, 11 July)

Poul-Henning Kamp

• Re: #603: Frame layout (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: #603: Frame layout (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: Expiration impending: <draft-nottingham-http-patch-status-00.txt> (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Fwd: Expiration impending: <draft-nottingham-http-patch-status-00.txt> (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: Connection: header in HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Connection: header in HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Connection: header in HTTP/2 (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Huffman [was: Re: h2 header field names] (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Huffman [was: Re: h2 header field names] (Friday, 5 September)
• Huffman [was: Re: h2 header field names] (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Saturday, 30 August)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Sunday, 17 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Sunday, 17 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Saturday, 16 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Saturday, 16 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: Static Table Entries (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Static Table Entries (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Static Table Entries (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: #557: Intra-message HEADERS frames (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: proxies are dangerous slide (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: #555: frame synchronization (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: #555: frame synchronization (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: #549: END_STREAM flag on CONTINUATION (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: #555: frame synchronization (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: #549: END_STREAM flag on CONTINUATION (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: #557: Intra-message HEADERS frames (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: #551: Limiting header sizes (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: #551: Limiting header sizes (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: http/2 and "extensions" (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Treating paths and queries differently, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-http-jfv-00.txt (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-http-jfv-00.txt (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: reserved flags and extensions (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Sunday, 13 July)
• Issues 555 and 556 (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: #540: "jumbo" frames (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: "Can we please append a byte to the HEADERS frame" (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: "Can we please append a byte to the HEADERS frame" (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Compressing HTTP headers (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Compressing HTTP headers (Monday, 7 July)
• Compressing HTTP headers (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION - option #4 (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: CRLF requirement (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: H2 HEADERS and flow control (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Size of window variables (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Size of window variables (Thursday, 3 July)
• Size of window variables (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: WINDOW_UPDATE(0) ? (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• WINDOW_UPDATE(0) ? (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: YAC Proposal (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: YAC Proposal (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (and not arguing about CONTINUATION frames) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 DoS Vulnerability (Was: HTTP/2 response completed before its request) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 DoS Vulnerability (Was: HTTP/2 response completed before its request) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 DoS Vulnerability (Was: HTTP/2 response completed before its request) (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• HTTP/2 DoS Vulnerability (Was: HTTP/2 response completed before its request) (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: CONTINUATION proposal w/ minimum change (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: CONTINUATION proposal w/ minimum change (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)

Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)

• RE: I-D Action: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00.txt (Tuesday, 1 July)

Richard Wheeldon (rwheeldo)

• RE: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 28 July)
• RE: Pseudo end-to-end connections considered harmful (Monday, 28 July)
• RE: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 July)
• RE: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• RE: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt (Friday, 11 July)
• RE: ext#9: OppSec and Proxies (Wednesday, 2 July)
• RE: #529: Working around concurrency limits (Wednesday, 2 July)

Rob Trace

• RE: #603: Frame layout (Monday, 29 September)
• RE: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 25 September)
• RE: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• RE: "Upgrade: h2c" (Thursday, 17 July)
• RE: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• RE: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• RE: willchan's thoughts on continuations, jumbo frames, etc after *only skimming* the threads (Friday, 11 July)
• RE: Large Frame Proposal (Friday, 11 July)
• RE: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)

Robert Collins

• Re: SETTINGS frame - not documented as peer-to-peer only (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Websockets (Monday, 29 September)
• SETTINGS frame - not documented as peer-to-peer only (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: #603: Frame layout (Monday, 29 September)
• HTTP/2 and Websockets (Monday, 29 September)
• upgrade prose bug (Monday, 29 September)
• HTTP/2 REFUSED_STREAM and applications (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)

Roberto Peon

• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Header Table and Static Table Indicies Switched (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: #557: Intra-message HEADERS frames (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Options for CONTINUATION-related issues (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Options for CONTINUATION-related issues (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Wiki for CONTINUATION Proposals (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Sending priority from a server (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Saturday, 12 July)
• A rough analysis of the impact of headers on DoS (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Bad Actors, was: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: YAC Proposal (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: YAC Proposal (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #529: Working around concurrency limits (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: YAC Proposal (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 DoS Vulnerability (Was: HTTP/2 response completed before its request) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 DoS Vulnerability (Was: HTTP/2 response completed before its request) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 DoS Vulnerability (Was: HTTP/2 response completed before its request) (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)

Roland Zink

• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Saturday, 16 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: ext#9: OppSec and Proxies (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Pseudo end-to-end connections considered harmful (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Pseudo end-to-end connections considered harmful (Thursday, 24 July)
• Pseudo end-to-end connections considered harmful (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Thursday, 10 July)
• Changing the Internet was: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: upgrade prose bug (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: Headers vs Response Code for 2NN Contents Of Related (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: #603: Frame layout (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Saturday, 20 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: 303 for paging; was Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 definition of HTTP2-Settings (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-14 and draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-09 (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Tuesday, 2 September)
• h2 definition of HTTP2-Settings (Monday, 1 September)
• h2 use of Upgrade (Monday, 1 September)
• h2 header field names (Monday, 1 September)
• h2 requirements on authoritative responses (Monday, 1 September)
• h2 priority (Sunday, 31 August)
• h2 padding (Saturday, 30 August)
• Re: h2 frame layout (Saturday, 30 August)
• h2 frame layout (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-14 and draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-09 (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: updated http 1.1 rfcs and hop-by-hop (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: referring to the HTTP spec (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Friday, 18 July)

Ruben Verborgh

• Re: referring to the HTTP spec (Tuesday, 22 July)
• referring to the HTTP spec (Tuesday, 22 July)

RUELLAN Herve

• RE: SETTINGS frame - not documented as peer-to-peer only (Tuesday, 30 September)
• RE: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Tuesday, 30 September)
• RE: h2 Connection Preface (Tuesday, 9 September)
• RE: h2 Connection Preface (Tuesday, 9 September)
• RE: h2 Connection Preface (Tuesday, 9 September)
• RE: HPACK WGLC feedback (Monday, 1 September)
• RE: HPACK, Draft 09, Integer Representation (Friday, 29 August)
• RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-09, 4.2. Header Field Representation Processing | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-09, 5.3. Entry Eviction when Adding New Entries (Friday, 29 August)
• RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-09, 3.3.2. Header Table (Friday, 29 August)
• RE: HPACK opcode bit patterns (Friday, 29 August)
• RE: Why "MUST" encoder emit Context Update (Thursday, 31 July)
• RE: Priority Tree Synchronization Draft (Monday, 21 July)
• Priority Tree Synchronization Draft (Sunday, 20 July)
• RE: #539: Priority from server to client (Wednesday, 16 July)
• RE: Sending priority from a server (Tuesday, 15 July)
• RE: #539: Priority from server to client (Tuesday, 15 July)
• RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-latest, 4.1 Header Field Representation Processing (Friday, 11 July)
• RE: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• RE: Reference set in HPACK (Thursday, 3 July)
• RE: #539: Priority from server to client (Tuesday, 1 July)
• RE: CONTINUATION proposal w/ minimum change (Tuesday, 1 July)

Ryan Hamilton

• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 5 August)

Salvatore Loreto

• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 14 July)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: Headers vs Response Code for 2NN Contents Of Related (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Headers vs Response Code for 2NN Contents Of Related (Sunday, 28 September)
• Re: Headers vs Response Code for 2NN Contents Of Related (Sunday, 28 September)
• Re: Headers vs Response Code for 2NN Contents Of Related (Saturday, 27 September)
• Headers vs Response Code for 2NN Contents Of Related (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: Why Range doesn't work for LDP "paging" (cf 2NN Contents-of-Related) (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Why Range doesn't work for LDP "paging" (cf 2NN Contents-of-Related) (Tuesday, 16 September)
• Why Range doesn't work for LDP "paging" (cf 2NN Contents-of-Related) (Tuesday, 16 September)
• Re: 303 for paging; was Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: 303 for paging; was Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: 303 for paging; was Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: 303 for paging; was Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Sunday, 7 September)
• 303 for paging; was Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: See Other vs Contents of Related, was: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Thursday, 4 September)

Shigeki Ohtsu

• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Wednesday, 2 July)

Simone Bordet

• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Tuesday, 2 September)
• HTTP/2 Push deployed on webtide.com (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: 1xx (informational) responses affect on stream management (Tuesday, 5 August)
• h2-14 live on webtide.com (Friday, 1 August)

Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management)

• Re: #603: Frame layout (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: #603: Frame layout (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: h2 Connection Preface (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: h2 Connection Preface (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: h2 Connection Preface (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: h2 Connection Preface (Tuesday, 9 September)
• h2 Connection Preface (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Huffman [was: Re: h2 header field names] (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Miscellaneous Comments on -14 (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Static Table Entries (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Static Table Entries (Friday, 8 August)
• Static Table Entries (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Constrained Devices (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Constrained Devices (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Constrained Devices (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Constrained Devices (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Constrained Devices (Monday, 4 August)
• HTTP/2 and Constrained Devices (Monday, 4 August)
• Miscellaneous Comments on -14 (Monday, 4 August)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: h2 frame layout (Monday, 1 September)

Stephen Farrell

• Re: null ciphers in 9.2.2 (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Saturday, 16 August)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring (Saturday, 16 August)

Stuart Douglas

• Re: SETTINGS frame - not documented as peer-to-peer only (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: SETTINGS frame - not documented as peer-to-peer only (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: PUSH_PROMISE and load balancers (Friday, 26 September)
• PUSH_PROMISE and load balancers (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Thursday, 18 September)

Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa

• Re: HPACK, Draft 09, Integer Representation (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: HPACK, Draft 09, Integer Representation (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: h2 proxy and connection flow control (Thursday, 21 August)
• h2 proxy and connection flow control (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: PRIORITY extension (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: CONTINUATION proposal w/ minimum change (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: CONTINUATION proposal w/ minimum change (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: CONTINUATION proposal w/ minimum change (Tuesday, 1 July)

Ted Hardie

• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)

Tony Hansen

• Re: Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed Standard (Monday, 28 July)

Walter H.

• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)

William Chow

• RE: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• RE: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• RE: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• RE: Push and Caching (Tuesday, 26 August)
• RE: Push and Caching (Thursday, 21 August)
• RE: ext#9: OppSec and Proxies (Friday, 1 August)

Willy Tarreau

• Re: Discussion of 9.2.2 (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: 9.2.2 Cipher fallback and FF<->Jetty interop problem (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Connection: header in HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Connection: header in HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Connection: header in HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 header field names (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 padding (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 use of Upgrade (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: h2 priority (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: HPACK WGLC feedback (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Header Parsing Profile (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed Standard (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: Consequences of removing the reference set (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: proxies are dangerous slide (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: "Upgrade: h2c" (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Options for CONTINUATION-related issues (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: #551: Limiting header sizes (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: reserved flags and extensions (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: reserved flags and extensions (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: reserved flags and extensions (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: reserved flags and extensions (Sunday, 13 July)
• reserved flags and extensions (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Wiki for CONTINUATION Proposals (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation. (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION - option #4 (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION - option #4 (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Size of window variables (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Size of window variables (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: YAC Proposal (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: trailers and pseudo-headers (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Participating to the WG (Was: Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem) (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: CRLF requirement (Tuesday, 1 July)

Yoav Nir

• Re: #555: frame synchronization (Monday, 21 July)
• Ciphersuites (was Re: Mandatory to implement cipher suites) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: reserved flags and extensions (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553) (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: #541: CONTINUATION (Wednesday, 2 July)

Yutaka Hirano

• Re: HTTP/2 and Websockets (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Websockets (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: HTTP/2 and Websockets (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: 5.5 Extending HTTP/2, WS_OVER_HTTP/2 | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2 (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: END_SEGMENT? (#397) (Tuesday, 1 July)

Yves Lafon

• Re: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: See Other vs Contents of Related, was: 2NN Contents Of Related (303 Shortcut) (Friday, 5 September)

Zhong Yu

• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: legality of Transfer-Encoding: chunked bodies in HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: :scheme, was: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: consensus on :query ? (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: CRLF requirement (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: CRLF requirement (Tuesday, 1 July)

山本和彦

• http2-14 (Friday, 5 September)
• Compression ratio of 09 (was: Reference set in HPACK) (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Reference set in HPACK (Wednesday, 2 July)

陈智昌

• willchan's thoughts on continuations, jumbo frames, etc after *only skimming* the threads (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Service Bindings DNS Records (draft-nygren-service-bindings-00) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Service Bindings DNS Records (draft-nygren-service-bindings-00) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Service Bindings DNS Records (draft-nygren-service-bindings-00) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Compressing HTTP headers (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frame Proposal (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: H2 HEADERS and flow control (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: H2 HEADERS and flow control (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: #529: Working around concurrency limits (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (and not arguing about CONTINUATION frames) (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: why not multiple, short-lived HTTP/2 connections? (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: HTTP/2 response completed before its request (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: why not multiple, short-lived HTTP/2 connections? (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: why not multiple, short-lived HTTP/2 connections? (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (Tuesday, 1 July)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2014 23:54:29 UTC