Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553)

I don't think alignment is important (the protocol is not guaranteed to
align anyway since payload is not required to be aligned, and so we'll end
up with unaligned loads on most streams..) but think it is OK either way.
-=R


On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 04:46:31PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> > There has been a lot of discussion over the last two weeks about various
> proposals to address a number of issues. While we're not at the point where
> we have consensus to accept any of them wholesale, I do think we can reduce
> the surface area of the discussion by declaring consensus on the less
> controversial parts.
> >
> > So: it appears that we have consensus to address issue #553 by:
> >
> > * Expanding the frame size field to 24 bits
> > * Reserving additional bits to align
> > * Adding a setting advertising the maximum frame size allowed by the
> recipient, with a default of 16K octets and a minimum of 256 octets
> >
> > This would address (only) <
> https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/553>.
> >
> > Does anyone have a problem with that, or further comments?
>
> Fine for me. +1
>
> Willy
>
>
>