W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Large Frame Proposal

From: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 22:06:18 -0400
Cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-id: <6864ED00-8186-4B78-879F-6BFFD2D34856@apple.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Mark,

On Jul 7, 2014, at 8:58 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>> ...
>> Or at least one issue that the fixed max frame size cannot be tuned for any reason
> 
> That's a design decision that was made a long time ago. To reconsider it, I need more than vague concerns that amount to "I don't like it"; I need concrete problems that it causes.

For printing 16k frames/chunks cause a 2x performance drop.  And for video streaming you'll likely see similar issues (and stuttering) due to the volume of data involved. (see my other post on the subject)

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair



Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2014 02:06:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC