W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Large Frame Proposal

From: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 22:06:18 -0400
Cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-id: <6864ED00-8186-4B78-879F-6BFFD2D34856@apple.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>

On Jul 7, 2014, at 8:58 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>> ...
>> Or at least one issue that the fixed max frame size cannot be tuned for any reason
> That's a design decision that was made a long time ago. To reconsider it, I need more than vague concerns that amount to "I don't like it"; I need concrete problems that it causes.

For printing 16k frames/chunks cause a 2x performance drop.  And for video streaming you'll likely see similar issues (and stuttering) due to the volume of data involved. (see my other post on the subject)

Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair

Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2014 02:06:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC