- From: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 17:35:17 +0900
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 12 July 2014 08:36:04 UTC
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > There has been a lot of discussion over the last two weeks about various > proposals to address a number of issues. While we're not at the point where > we have consensus to accept any of them wholesale, I do think we can reduce > the surface area of the discussion by declaring consensus on the less > controversial parts. > > So: it appears that we have consensus to address issue #553 by: > > * Expanding the frame size field to 24 bits > * Reserving additional bits to align > * Adding a setting advertising the maximum frame size allowed by the > recipient, with a default of 16K octets and a minimum of 256 octets > > This would address (only) <https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/553 > >. > > Does anyone have a problem with that, or further comments? > > I'm OK with this. Best regards, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa > Regards, > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 12 July 2014 08:36:04 UTC