- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 07:10:52 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <751772A5-B4A5-4F8C-8F25-339DF9CE2375@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri tes: >2. Require priority to be sent in a PRIORITY frame (removing it from = >HEADERS) As much as I would hate if we did it, there is the option of two frame formats: Short frames have no payload, and the length field can be used for 24 bits of information. Long frames have a payload and the length field tells how long it is. In addition to PRIORITY frames, that could shave 4 bytes of all WINDOW_UPDATES -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2014 07:11:18 UTC