Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535)

On 17 July 2014 16:59, Greg Wilkins <> wrote:
> So at least it looks like all the voices here can live with 100 semantics.

That's taking liberties.  I think that Mark will make that sort of
assessment.  And I note that the number of participants is pretty low.

> I prefer keeping RFC723x semantic exactly.

So you've said.  But you keep talking about mechanisms rather than
semantics.  It seems to me like you want a near-perfect facsimile of
the mechanism too.

Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 00:13:08 UTC