- From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 20:05:07 +1000
- To: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>
- Cc: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAH_y2NGYcDvPcxDvaTRBP3p4Pnb7gw39WUDY3bNVnOGQjBgciQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 17 September 2014 17:52, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org> wrote: > By the way, the browser has to do the same thing, in order to decide > which cipher suites to block for HTTP/2, and they manage just fine. > Brian, the problem is not coming up with an algorithm to decide on what ciphers are acceptable. The problem is coming up with EXACTLY THE SAME algorithm as all clients to decide what ciphers are acceptable. If at some time in the future the client and server interpret 9.2.2 differently against the then current available ciphers, then it is possible for the server to select, in good faith a cipher that it thinks is h2 acceptable, but the client does not. The result is GO_AWAY and no retry. Worse yet, a server has to deal with multiple user-agents out there, that might eventually have different interpretations of what an acceptable h2 cipher is. The server is then going to have to do user-agent guessing before it has even accepted a connection from the client! Ugh! So yes I mostly fix this today, with a regex or by hard coding some AEAD requirements in the same way that FF has done. But my question is, how do I keep that regex and hard coded requirements up to date with all the browsers out there? What mechanism is there to ensure that we all update our regex's and code in lockstep? If we can't update in lockstep, then this problem is again going to cause communication failures. So I can't simply write a patch, unless I know that all client vendors are going simultaneously write and release the same patch for their product and the entire universe turns it on at precisely the same time! Actually, even today, if presented with some funky ciphers like Ilari has highlighted, how do I know that I've implemented 9.2.2 exactly the same as FF and that they have it exactly the same as Chrome, Opera, etc.? 9.2.2 is too vague and terms like "such as" are not defined in RFC2119 -- Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2014 10:05:39 UTC