- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 05:18:14 +0000
- To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
- cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <CACweHNBe5o7_tmTXGqhRBGBAZPoDVJHKToGm7ARee4oqURupfw@mail.gmail.com> , Matthew Kerwin writes: >I'm much less keen on reducing the size of frame_type field, because that >would limit my ability to play with my toys^H^H^H^Hextensions[2][3]. There's a word for protocols which need 256 frame types: "Wrong". -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 30 August 2014 05:18:44 UTC