W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: h2 frame layout

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 05:18:14 +0000
To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <49218.1409375894@critter.freebsd.dk>
--------
In message <CACweHNBe5o7_tmTXGqhRBGBAZPoDVJHKToGm7ARee4oqURupfw@mail.gmail.com>
, Matthew Kerwin writes:

>I'm much less keen on reducing the size of frame_type field, because that
>would limit my ability to play with my toys^H^H^H^Hextensions[2][3].

There's a word for protocols which need 256 frame types:  "Wrong".

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 30 August 2014 05:18:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC