Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-link-method-10.txt

No, I'll be asking the AD to sponsor. If the AD does not wish to sponsor it
as an Independent submission, I will consider the WG option.
On Aug 1, 2014 6:20 PM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Hi James,
>
> As per <http://httpwg.github.io/specs/rfc7231.html#status.code.registry>,
> the policy for new HTTP methods is IETF Review <
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5226#section-4.1>.
>
> That means that this needs to be a WG document or AD-sponsored.
>
> Are you asking the WG to consider adopting this draft?
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> On 2 Aug 2014, at 5:26 am, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Would like to get this into Last call. Comments welcome.
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From:  <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> > Date: Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:25 PM
> > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-snell-link-method-10.txt
> > To: "James M. Snell" <jasnell@gmail.com>
> >
> >
> >
> > A new version of I-D, draft-snell-link-method-10.txt
> > has been successfully submitted by James M Snell and posted to the
> > IETF repository.
> >
> > Name:           draft-snell-link-method
> > Revision:       10
> > Title:          HTTP Link and Unlink Methods
> > Document date:  2014-08-01
> > Group:          Individual Submission
> > Pages:          7
> > URL:
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-link-method-10.txt
> > Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-snell-link-method/
> > Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-link-method-10
> > Diff:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-snell-link-method-10
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This specification defines the semantics of the LINK and UNLINK HTTP
> >   methods.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > The IETF Secretariat
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>