- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 07:55:48 +0200
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: Simone Bordet <simone.bordet@gmail.com>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:56:41AM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Sep 18, 2014, at 9:33 AM, Simone Bordet wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote: > >> I still don't believe that any of these requirements belong in h2, > >> and I won't implement them even if they end up in the RFC. > > > > As much as I would like to have 9.2.2 reworded to delegate to the TLS > > spec, not implementing it on servers while all major browsers > > implements it will result in a closed connection, no fallback and an > > empty white page. > > No, it will just be left to the administrator to configure the right ciphers. > Doing that inside an application protocol is insane. Totally agreed, and for haproxy it will certainly be the same, on both sides! Willy
Received on Friday, 19 September 2014 05:56:20 UTC