- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 15:32:05 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: Kinkie <gkinkie@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <DDFE70F0-2BBC-4284-8DC1-B49FA61F56D9@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri tes: >I'm only hearing PHK and Kinkie argue for this, and the people I'm >seeing F2F in Toronto are against it. Could you get them to say why ? >Considering how big of a change this is, I don't think there's >enough support to get it over the wall. This is not necessarily a big change, it may be as little as 1-N bit wide sequence number which increments in every frame. I raised this issue because I have seen any mention of frame-desynchronization or detection probabilities thereof anywhere at all ? I agree that sooner or later something will blow up, my question is if "later" is soon enough or of we should do something to increase probability of detection. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 15:32:37 UTC