Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535)

On 2014-07-18 02:42, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Greg,
>
> You're talking about a separable issue here; Julian's proposal is to maintain our current approach to 100 (Continue), and that has had very broad support within the WG.
>
> Cheers,

Well, my proposal is for 1xx other than 100 or 101. I haven't thought 
about what's the best way to emulate expect/continue in HTTP/2.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 06:37:08 UTC