- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:31:54 -0700
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Kazu Yamamoto <kazu@iij.ad.jp>, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>
Yup. algorithmic compressed were deemed to be "uninteresting" to the working group at this time... although, the current stateful compression doesn't really do anything to make transmission of timestamps and other frequently changing values more efficient, which is unfortunate. On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 15 July 2014 03:50, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >> Has anybody thought about putting algorithmic compressions in the static table? > > Yes. >
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 17:32:41 UTC