- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:29:25 +0200
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 09:18:49AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <CAH_y2NFTWTP4DMaxCNYs1JqOCM8V+iwS7KZOui7Vua+bNMvgbg@mail.gmail.com>, Greg Wilkins wri > tes: > > >I'd like to see 100 semantic supported in h2, > > But isn't it already supported via the per-stream windows ? > > It's true that the sender can fill the initial per stream window > before the receiver has a chance to decide if it wants the body > or not, but I've never seen the 100-Continue as a mechanism to > avoid sending a few unwanted tens of kilobyts, but rather to avoid > sending unwanted mega- and gigabytes ? It's also used a lot by webservices and other clients relying on connection pools to ensure that a connection is still alive before sending a non-idempotent request over it. I don't see what benefit it could provide in HTTP/2 however since we can abort an upload in progress. Willy
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 09:29:55 UTC