- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 05:57:42 +0000
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- cc: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>, Johnny Graettinger <jgraettinger@chromium.org>, William Chan (ιζΊζ) <willchan@chromium.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, Jesse Wilson <jesse@swank.ca>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CAP+FsNfnhCC4d-Z3uPAZTj4+xAXhQmPKPbx-J7Li=FL+=67OSg@mail.gmail.com>, Roberto Peon writes: >> Yeah, well, sorry for not having a budget to spend on HTTP/2... > >You've effectively stated that you don't believe in it and would have >nothing to do with it in the past. >I'm guessing this had little to do with budget. It had a lot to do with budget: If there were no chance of getting a good protocol out of it, I had better things to spend my money on. (In difference from a lot of you, I run a one-man company, so slack or "strategic" funds are in very short supply.) I'll leave it to the black hats to settle the debate. Since it seems HTTP/2 is just going to be a short lived stopgap on top of TLS only, maybe it will never become a real problem. In HTTP/3 we'll have to be serious about it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 05:58:07 UTC