- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:20:02 +0200
- To: Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-08-19 15:10, Erik Nygren wrote: > Ah, of course. Having different data models between the header and the > frame > seems like it will be unfortunate and lead to more complicated > implementations. > If we're going to allow multiple Alt-Svc header targets, it seems like > we'd want > something similar for the frame, especially if we have full set replacement > semantics which seems potentially easier to reason about. > > Could we alter the ALTSVC frame to allow for multiple targets within > the frame? Or have a flag of "more ALTSVC follows" to allow a series > of the frames in-sequence for the same origin? Either would bring > the two back in alignment. The latter seems more annoying from > a state machine perspective. > > Erik That sounds right to me. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 13:20:33 UTC