- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:07:46 +1300
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 29/09/2014 11:09 a.m., Adrian Cole wrote: > Agreed. > > If we are talking trivial changes to implement like switching this > back or mucking with static table or huffman codes, I don't mind. > They are easy to knock out vs rearranging frames, op-codes, > lengths, etc. Strange. I find quite the opposite. Re-arranging the order of a fixed sequence of struct members or parser calls to fill them is far easier than implementing a whole management mechanism to cope with static table ID changes every time a header is parsed or scheduled to be written to a connection. Amos -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUKPcxAAoJELJo5wb/XPRjbI8H/ij9WkYGGNJG4ZjxhdCIOT9u 5PSKFL1HZ6/xebfNTnCKIaG84JkOPGMqIa6OLXi7aImNBZLM83748LFfyrREjnU1 koOxfeR/c9xThR8dew2+AgUmLFBeqp8F4b/syB/Elekt5RKqvRrYAhgPVfr4uSIO XR9EWzAC765jOI2w+4yyoZO9VdjRer8GJha5KOeUL68LYV9mUKTcTLj7tDoiTQMH AYvfW2VFqH1x5dzKNfT7EEw0qXoJk72RmmDmbB0rCmc8tvy/VAA+H0CLtenRAoF2 C35ImfbXCnvcdoVli2277SuBvAa/v8771nb9IYcoEICtN5iZMm1m/HtfMifBT10= =fUMS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 29 September 2014 06:08:22 UTC