- From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 18:28:16 +1000
- To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 3 August 2014 08:28:44 UTC
On 3 August 2014 11:55, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote: > Why would we give up 8% in compression If that 8% is something general, then I don't think we should give it up and I would be happy to swap back. But you'd have to admit that your use-case of 16 headers like: X-Some-Very-Large-Header-Name: someSmall# is unlikely to be a common case. In the data I have, the usage of known headers exceeds the usage of custom headers, so my numbers show that it is better to favour known headers with 1B indexes. I'd be very surprised if general traffic was any different to that, but hopefully somebody with access to some good generally representative data can provide the data.... perhaps the same data set used to determine the huffman encoding? cheers -- Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Sunday, 3 August 2014 08:28:44 UTC