- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 21:32:20 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- cc: "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CABkgnnUcP9QToaDru75nYqgy2E=+m8nSoevhSYfKQmKODNR0OQ@mail.gmail.com>, Martin Thomson w rites: >On 12 July 2014 13:46, <K.Morgan@iaea.org> wrote: >> So, why not move PRIORITY to an extension? It would make the main spec smaller and cleaner. > >A multiplexed protocol doesn't work without prioritization. Or >rather, it ends up worse than what we currently have. But we agree that it is optional, right ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sunday, 13 July 2014 21:32:42 UTC