- From: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 08:12:09 -0400
- To: David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2014 12:12:37 UTC
David, On Aug 6, 2014, at 6:58 AM, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > Also, an implementation can treat “without indexing” as “never indexed” and use a common code path, since the encodings are identical modulo a don’t-care bit. Wouldn’t be surprised if that was deliberate. That's the approach I am taking, and frankly I wouldn't cry if we just did away with the semantic difference and just had "never indexed". While I don't think the extra bit will make a huge difference in compression ratio, it would simplify all implementations and it puts the onus of efficient encoding on the sender (vs. intermediaries like proxies). _________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2014 12:12:37 UTC