- From: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 10:37:30 -0700
- To: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Must have missed the connection between removing the "reference set" and switching the table order. I am happy to show data on how it is worse, specifically encoding header names indices is now 200% worse ;) On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com> wrote: > This was discussed in "Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552)”. Greg had a bunch of data showing static first was better. > > On Aug 1, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote: > >> Guessing I missed the discussion on this, but in the latest HPACK >> draft the static table was to lower indices than the header table >> instead of higher indices. >> >> This now requires an extra byte (2 instead of 1) to index almost any >> name not in the static table. >> >> Opened https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/578 to track. >> > > -- > Jason T. Greene > WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect > JBoss, a division of Red Hat >
Received on Friday, 1 August 2014 17:38:00 UTC