Re: Encouraging a healthy HTTP/2 ecosystem (and not arguing about CONTINUATION frames)

On 1 July 2014 at 22:12:52, William Chan (陈智昌) ( wrote:

> Forking my thread to regain sanity :) Learning from my mistake and deleting the CONTINUATION frame bullet.  

Not a bad idea. =) 

So, I'd like to add my concern that "features that aren't necessarily 
required" is going to include plaintext HTTP/2. Chrome and FF have all 
acknowledged that they're not going to support this, which really only 
leaves IE as a major client implementation that will support it. 
Additionally, some of the smaller client implementations don't 
(okhttp2, hyper). Is anyone concerned about this being an area of the 
spec that has relatively little coverage? Should we be asking Chrome 
and FF to go against what they'd clearly like to do and to implement 
plaintext Upgrade?

Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 19:33:18 UTC