- From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:32:06 -0400
- To: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Zhong, --On July 22, 2014 at 10:23:48 AM -0500 Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com> wrote: >> Well now, some CalDAV servers are using 100-Continue as a keep-alive > > That seems a misuse of 100. Maybe 303 (one or more) is better. I don't see how that can be applicable to this keep-alive case. If we wanted to have the client do a follow-up request to get the actual result of a time consuming request, then 202 Accepted would be the better way to do that. -- Cyrus Daboo
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2014 15:32:36 UTC