W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553)

From: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 12:43:22 -0500
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6B6FEDED-E7AB-4FC7-958B-3EF80B4E1C8C@redhat.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
+1

On Jul 12, 2014, at 1:46 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> There has been a lot of discussion over the last two weeks about various proposals to address a number of issues. While we're not at the point where we have consensus to accept any of them wholesale, I do think we can reduce the surface area of the discussion by declaring consensus on the less controversial parts.
> 
> So: it appears that we have consensus to address issue #553 by:
> 
> * Expanding the frame size field to 24 bits
> * Reserving additional bits to align 
> * Adding a setting advertising the maximum frame size allowed by the recipient, with a default of 16K octets and a minimum of 256 octets
> 
> This would address (only) <https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/553>. 
> 
> Does anyone have a problem with that, or further comments?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Jason T. Greene
WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Received on Saturday, 12 July 2014 17:43:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC