- From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:58:30 +1000
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAH_y2NGC1gJ_ks-FPQNJw9ZWvNYZV_ZQuYN+yqahLOJEXyXV9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Move this here as don't want to discuss on issue comments: On 13 August 2014 17:23, Mark Nottingham <notifications@github.com> wrote: > application/x-javascript is non-standard; I don't think we want to > encourage that. > > text/html; charset=utf8 might be more the go. > > images, css and javascript were all more frequent than html. But if none of them have good standard content-types, then I'm OK to favour text/html; charset=utf8 A few more: > > - If we're going to include expect, why not 100-continue? > - If we're going to include access-control-allow-origin, it'd be nice > to confirm with the W3C that this is going to stick (they've had a few > tries at CORS), and that there's not anything else on the horizon. > - If-Unmodified-Since? Really? > - Max-Forwards? Considering we're no longer hop-by-hop, that's a good > trick. > - Refresh is non-standard, and badly interoperable. Shouldn't be > encouraged. > - Uhhhhh, we don't allow Transfer-Encoding; why is it in the static > table? > > All good points..... I'm starting to feel that these all combined warrant a breaking change in themselves... but no hurry to do so. cheers -- Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2014 07:58:58 UTC