- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:09:26 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- cc: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <53B3F54D.6070009@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes: >There are many cases where a server would say "200", and then start a >complicated process that might fail half-way. In HTTP/1.1, signalling an >error in this situation is hard (abort the chunked transfer or close the >connection). It would be good if HTTP/2 can do better here. I thought that was what RST_STREAM was for ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 12:09:49 UTC