- From: David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 10:21:31 +0800
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014–07–02, at 10:11 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > On 2 Jul 2014, at 3:49 am, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm split between demanding RST_STREAM+PROTOCOL_ERROR or ignoring >> unknown values. Slight preference for the former though. I think >> that's consistent with Matthew's proposal. > > +1 for hard fail. That gives applications a tough choice. Perhaps the corresponding non-pseudo header should always be a fallback, implemented at the API level, if the pseudo header is absent? I’m not clear on what appeal pseudo headers currently have at all, except to a punctuation fetish.
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 02:22:16 UTC