W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 21:33:01 +0000
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <33174.1405891981@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <9B85C3C7-4787-4355-8F6B-0754D100F353@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri
tes:

>My reading of the WG is that the best we're going to do for consensus 
>here is option (b) - keeping continuation, and adding an advisory 
>setting for the largest uncompressed header set that a recipient is 
>willing to accept. 
>
>Does anyone have further information to addd? If not, will mark as 
>editor-ready.

If we're having to live with the CONTINUATION DOS-vector, can we at
least have the END-STREAM flag appear on the last CONTINUATION
frame ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sunday, 20 July 2014 21:33:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC