Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "reference set" from HPACK (to address #552)

I am also interested in this.  If we have data to demonstrate the advantage
of reference set, I can get behind that.

Best regards,
Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa

2014/07/15 1:36 "Cory Benfield" <cory@lukasa.co.uk>:
>
> On 14 July 2014 17:02, Johnny Graettinger <jgraettinger@chromium.org>
wrote:
> > Chromium has offered to do a study on this. That offer received no
response
> > or endorsements.
> >
> > It would still be interesting to do, but only if there's honest
engagement
> > and buy-in from the list. Setting up something like this takes time,
and is
> > not compatible with the rate-of-change in arguments we're seeing on the
list
> > lately.
>
> I've expressed interest in this data at least twice: once directly
> from you, and once in a more coded form when I suggested that it would
> be nice to have even more test data to test HPACK interop on. If you
> can get this data I'll happily evaluate it. I'd also love it if we
> could broaden our corpus of sample headers (as used by the HTTP2JP
> group's HPACK test cases) to reflect what you believe to be a more
> reasonable sample of web traffic. Having that large corpus of data
> will be useful for evaluating future compression proposals (assuming
> there will be some).
>