- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 06:36:02 +0000
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- cc: David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
In message <CAP+FsNdwizDUMCunLGhftkfgbJfstvAG3Ux8qtpHuL=jHv5eAA@mail.gmail.com>, Roberto Peon writes: >For my part, I still see that END_SEGMENT or something similar provides for >interesting characteristics for HTTP2->1 gateways in allowing chunks to be >reproduced (and we know that there are issues there) as well as allowing >the coalescing/tunneling of protocols such as WS onto the connection, >making them more viable. What issues would those be and where do we know them to exist ? Are they hacks to be discouraged or architecture to be respected ? I have yet to hear about any issues with Varnish making totally random (seen form the applications point of view) decisions about chunk sizes. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 06:36:24 UTC