2014/07/14 9:46 "Patrick McManus" <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>: > > The whole point of h2 is a prioritized, muxxed protocol with improved connection handling. > > Let's complete that work. > I couldn't agree more. Removing PRIORITY is really bad idea. Best regards, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa > -P > > > > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 7:55 PM, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 2014–07–13, at 4:46 AM, K.Morgan@iaea.org wrote: >> >> > As far as I can tell, everything in h2-13 related to PRIORITY is completely optional (please correct me if I'm wrong). >> > >> > I've repeatedly seen arguments against adding anything optional to the spec. So why does PRIORITY get a pass? If it's truly optional, it could easily be moved to a separate RFC as an extension. >> >> I’m in favor. >> >> Clients wishing to send PRIORITY should know whether the server is just going to ignore it. It’s a good signal to use another prioritization strategy, for example by reducing concurrency (start streams later). >> >> Also, it’s had the most churn of any part of the spec and practical experience will take more time. Extension status will enable faster evolution. >> >> >
Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 00:58:44 UTC